The Soul of Supervision: Counselor Spirituality

Garner, Curtis M.; Webb, L. Kay; Chaffin, Carol; Byars, Allyn

doi:10.1002/cvj.12047

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The output of Table 1 states that the SD value is 0.63. If this value is combined with a logit average value of 0.0, then item difficulty level can be categorized as follows: 31,28,12,26,19,27,20 Easy 5,11,6,32,13,29,15,16,18,9,14,2,7,10 Very Easy 17, 4, 3, 8, 1…”

Section: Item Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Also, the supervision achieves good results and awareness of differences in the ability to be internalized by participants so that it fosters the desire to learn more about competent counselors [5] The studies mentioned are just a few of the research results that have positively impacted the supervision work alliance. Through the work alliance, the counselor's supervision will help support the running of guidance and counseling services [6]. Counselors need to have optimal skills to understand and follow the provisions in carrying out their professional activities [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Examining the Supervision Work Alliance Scale: A Rasch Model Approach

Taufiq¹,

Yudha²,

Hapsah³

et al. 2021

TOPSYJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The supervisory working alliance has a role in facilitating guidance and counseling supervisors in providing understanding of how the service works. Measuring the level of supervision work alliance is one way that can be done to find out whether a supervisor has a good supervisory work alliance or not. Objective: The research aims to describe the quality of the Supervision Work Alliance Scale (SWAS) instrument. Materials and Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional method with a quantitative research design. Participants in this study were counseling teachers implementing the internship program with 17 males and 55 females. This type of parameter needs to be identified by the category coefficient of the RASCH scoring function model for polycotomic responses. Results: The results show that as many as 34 items proved to be compatible with SWAS instruments. The cronbach alpha of the instrument was 0.91 which means that the all items were in the high category of reliability. The misfit items were only 5,88, so all of the items in SWAS were well understood by the participants. Conclusion: The development of SWAS instrument is valid and reliable, so it can be used to measure the variable of the supervisory work alliance

show abstract

Section: Item Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the Supervision Work Alliance Scale: A Rasch Model Approach

Taufiq¹,

Yudha²,

Hapsah³

et al. 2021

TOPSYJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In an examination of counseling psychology supervisees, rapport was the strongest predictor of frequency of spiritual dialogue in supervision (Weinstein, 2006). In a more recent study of counseling students and supervisors at a religious university, students who reported a higher sense of purpose indicated more discussion of spiritual issues in supervision (Garner et al, 2017). However, supervisors still perceived discussing spiritual issues more often than did supervisees (Garner et al, 2017).…”

Section: Supervision In Counselor Training Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sacred Space: Student Supervisees' Experiences of Spiritual Issues

Gonzales‐Wong

Harris

2021

Counseling and Values

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this phenomenological study, we explored student supervisees' experiences of spiritual issues during practicum. Six participants from programs accredited by the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs completed a demographic questionnaire and a semistructured interview. Participants reported experiences of internal tension due to spiritual issues and expressed hesitation in discussing spiritual issues with supervisors, prior to seeking resolution through reflecting on their counselor training, engaging in discussion with their supervisor depending on the comfort level in the relationship, and seeking outside support. Recommendations for counselor educators and supervisors are provided.

show abstract

“…There were broadscale accounts of most and least helpful events in individual, triadic, and group supervision (Fickling, Borders, Mobley, & Wester, 2017) and more in‐depth exploration of challenging supervisory issues, including providing corrective feedback (Borders, Welfare, Sackett, & Cashwell, 2017), nondisclosure in triadic supervision (Lonn & Juhnke, 2017), power dynamics within the supervisory relationship (De Stefano, Hutman, & Gazzola, 2017), and feedback exchanged in group supervision (Wahesh, Kemer, Willis, & Schmidt, 2017). Quantitative exploration included attention to relationships between spirituality and supervisory working alliance (Garner, Webb, Chaffin, & Byars, 2017) and complex interplays between attachment systems, supervisory relationships, and critical feedback (McKibben & Webber, 2017). Finally, Fickling and Tangen (2017) used dual autoethnography to explore their own development in feminist supervision.…”

Section: Supervisionmentioning

confidence: 99%