“…Research on teaching children history strongly supports theories of constructivism (Brophy & VanSledright, 1997;Levstik & Barton, 2005; National Center for History in the Schools, 1996; National Council for History Education, 2007;National Council for Social Studies, 1994). This construction of knowledge is a focus point of robust history and social studies teaching and learning (Barton & Levstik, 2004;Grant & Gradwell, 2005 As advocates of engaging students in historical inquiry and of the use of primary sources to aid in this inquiry, we support the claims of numerous student benefits, such as learning to detect bias, appreciating the interpretive nature of historical thinking, and the drawing of conclusions based on judgments about evidence (Fehn & Koeppen, 1998;Haeussler Bohan & Davis, 1998;Seixas 1998;Yeager & Davis, 1996). However, classroom teachers may not use artifacts and primary sources for various reasons, including their beliefs about their students' developmental immaturity, feeling such materials are time-consuming and not getting enough bang for the buck, having difficulty creating appropriate lessons, or simply lacking a sufficient understanding of history themselves (Levstik & Barton, 2005).…”