2018 Space Flight Mechanics Meeting 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-1973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spacecraft Orbital Characterization Kit and its Applications to the CYGNSS Mission.

Abstract: The rapid increase of the number of objects in orbit around the Earth poses a serious threat to operational spacecraft and astronauts. In order to effectively avoid collisions, mission operators need to assess the risk of collision between the satellite and any other object whose orbit is likely to approach its trajectory. Several algorithms predict the probability of collision but have limitations that impair the accuracy of the prediction. An important limitation is that uncertainties in the atmospheric dens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Developed in C, SpOCK supports parallelism and is therefore well suited for ensemble, Monte Carlo, or satellite constellation analysis. The algorithm and its different functionalities are presented in Bussy‐Virat et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Developed in C, SpOCK supports parallelism and is therefore well suited for ensemble, Monte Carlo, or satellite constellation analysis. The algorithm and its different functionalities are presented in Bussy‐Virat et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all three cases, the time of close approach is 2 days after the epoch. The dynamic model used a spherical Earth with no perturbations, since the goal of this study was to validate the algorithm for computation of the probability of collision, while SpOCK's propagator and its dynamic model were validated in a previous study (Bussy-Virat et al, 2018). Figure 5 shows the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) computed by SpOCK for Cases 1 (top), 6 (center), and 7 (bottom).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has the significant advantage of reducing the specular point calculation duty cycle which can result in significant on-board savings of available computational resources. Additionally, there are publically available orbit propagation tools which can be integrated into a forward orbit prediction module, including the SGP4 [33] or SPoCK [34] orbit propagation tool sets.…”
Section: Interpolated Prediction Of Specular Point Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fails to capture how the changing composition of the thermosphere with altitude affects the gas‐surface interactions on the spacecraft faces, leading to a variable drag coefficient. The Spacecraft Orbital Characterization Kit (SpOCK), an orbital propagator developed at the University of Michigan, does not rely on B ∗ when using TLEs to perform orbit prediction (Bussy‐Virat, Getchius, & Ridley, 2018). Instead, it allows the user to describe the spacecraft geometry with a CAD file or describe the orientation and area of all the spacecraft faces manually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%