2018
DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2018.1427929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spanish Version of the Empathy Questionnaire (EmQue): Evidence for Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Relationship With Emotional Regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
29
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mothers rated their child’s behaviors over the previous 2 months on a 3-point scale (0 = no , 1 = sometimes , and 2 = often ). Its short-form version includes 13 items with the same tridimensional structure (Grazzani et al, 2016; Lucas-Molina et al, 2018; see Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Mothers rated their child’s behaviors over the previous 2 months on a 3-point scale (0 = no , 1 = sometimes , and 2 = often ). Its short-form version includes 13 items with the same tridimensional structure (Grazzani et al, 2016; Lucas-Molina et al, 2018; see Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across samples, the assumed sequence of the first three stages of empathy was reflected by the EmQue. The levels of prosocial actions positively and most strongly correlated with age, while the levels of emotional contagion and attention to others’ feelings were either unrelated or less strongly correlated with age in preschool children (Grazzani et al, 2016; Lucas-Molina et al, 2018; Rieffe et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, a mean score was computed of all items across subscales, separately for mother‐reported and father‐reported responses, to obtain one comprehensive measure of child empathy (Ketelaar et al., 2017). The EmQue has previously shown satisfactory criterion and concurrent validity and reliability (Lucas‐Molina et al., 2018; Rieffe et al., 2010), as well as measurement invariance across time and gender (Grazzani et al., 2017; Lucas‐Molina et al., 2018). In the current study, reliability was acceptable (mothers: Cronbach's α = .75; fathers: α = .76).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%