2018
DOI: 10.15173/glj.v9i3.3713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spectre of Social Democracy: A Symptomatic Reading of the Power Resources Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, labour turnover might be an expression of labour unrest in a Silverian understanding (Silver, 2003), but might also be part of the reorganisation of domination. Our findings contribute to the recent debate on the power resources approach in this journal (Gallas, 2018;Nowak, 2018;Schmalz, Ludwig and Webster, 2018). They caution against conceptualising "power" as something that can be accumulated and invested into class struggle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Likewise, labour turnover might be an expression of labour unrest in a Silverian understanding (Silver, 2003), but might also be part of the reorganisation of domination. Our findings contribute to the recent debate on the power resources approach in this journal (Gallas, 2018;Nowak, 2018;Schmalz, Ludwig and Webster, 2018). They caution against conceptualising "power" as something that can be accumulated and invested into class struggle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Se deberán seguir probando estas hipótesis sobre la capacidad estructurante de la acción sindical, sobre la mutabilidad de las dominaciones del capital (de sus regímenes) y sobre las posibilidades de "desprecarización" del trabajo en otros sectores económicos y países. Estos aspectos deberían considerarse como elementos claves a la hora de evaluar los efectos y orientaciones de los recursos de poder de la clase trabajadora (Nowak, 2018).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…The issue of class relations leads us to an important misunderstanding of the PRA by some of the responses. In particular Gallas (2018) and Nowak (2018) perceive the PRA as a self-referential research heuristic that is largely detached from an analysis of global capitalism. At this point, it is important to clarify the intention of the PRA and to outline some of the discussions that took place a decade ago on the development of this approach.…”
Section: Areas Of Misunderstanding: Contextualising the Pramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is particularly striking that Nowak (2018) and Gallas (2018) both refer in their articles to labour conflicts in former German state-owned companies and state-dominated or highly regulated economic sectors (airlines and railways) in order to criticise the PRA without contextualising the cases in the larger development of German capitalism, thereby drawing a distorted picture of the role of unions in these developments. For instance, in the case of recent labour conflicts in the railway sector, marketisation has played a major role, both changing working conditions and eroding institutional power, a process German rail unions EVG and its predecessors GDA and Transnet did not vigorously challenge as they relied on a strategy of social partnership without reflecting upon the changing context.…”
Section: Areas Of Misunderstanding: Contextualising the Pramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation