1997
DOI: 10.1177/0959354397074006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spread of Statistical Significance Testing in Psychology

Abstract: Because the widespread use of statistical significance testing has deleterious consequences for the development of a cumulative knowledge base, the American Psychological Association's Board of Scientific Affairs is in the process of appointing a Task Force whose charge includes the possibility of phasing out such testing in textbooks and journal articles. Just how popular is significance testing in psychology? This issue is examined in the present historical study, which uses data from randomly selected issue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of null hypothesis significance tests is widespread in OP research (Bonett & Wright, 2007;Hubbard, Parsa, & Luthy, 1997). This practice follows naturally from our tendency to pose hypotheses that predict a nonnull effect of unstated magnitude, which are then tested by determining whether a test statistic differs from zero at some conventional probability level, such as p < .05.…”
Section: Adopt Alternatives To Null Hypothesis Significance Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of null hypothesis significance tests is widespread in OP research (Bonett & Wright, 2007;Hubbard, Parsa, & Luthy, 1997). This practice follows naturally from our tendency to pose hypotheses that predict a nonnull effect of unstated magnitude, which are then tested by determining whether a test statistic differs from zero at some conventional probability level, such as p < .05.…”
Section: Adopt Alternatives To Null Hypothesis Significance Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As concluded by Lehmann (1992) [32] in a comprehensive review, despite its shortcomings, the new paradigm of statistical hypothesis, and the many developments carried out within its framework continue to play a central role in both the theory and practice of statistics. However, significance testing has particularly been the favored statistical tool in some experimental social sciences [33], while other fields have favored the estimation of parameters (e.g., effect size). It is used as a substitute for the traditional comparison of the predicted value and experimental result at the core of the scientific method.…”
Section: On the Old And New Way Of Doing Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hubbard, Parsa, and Luthy (1997) tracked the uptake of NHST in the JAP from 1917 to 1994. In the following two sections, we discuss briefly some studies of journal reporting practices of most relevance to our own analysis.…”
Section: Official Jap Standards For Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%