2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The state of Indian tourism and hospitality research: A review and analysis of journal publications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But no studies could be identified linking this rise in social media to the intention to use it for travel. In the comprehensive review of literature published on tourism in India by Singh (2016), we do not find any mention of outbound leisure travel among the types of tourism studied. Even Mody et al (2014) find limited research on motivations for international travellers among Indians.…”
Section: Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…But no studies could be identified linking this rise in social media to the intention to use it for travel. In the comprehensive review of literature published on tourism in India by Singh (2016), we do not find any mention of outbound leisure travel among the types of tourism studied. Even Mody et al (2014) find limited research on motivations for international travellers among Indians.…”
Section: Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Survey analysis is less common (Ebrahim and Ganguli, 2016), indicating that the use of advanced statistical analyses is rare. This is problematic, because sophisticated statistical analyses can better identify any causality between the variables and check the robustness of these relationships, thus providing information that is more useful for tourism practitioners and researchers (Musinguzi, 2016; Singh, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In evaluations; the number of publications, the journal with the highest publication number, the subjects studied intensively, the methods used in the studies, the most cited studies, the most productive authors and the institutions are used. Such that, Andreu, Claver and Quer (2010), Tsang and Hsu (2011) evaluate research performance in China; Köseoglu, Sehitoglu and Parnell (2015) in Turkey; Musinguzi (2016) in Qatar and Singh (2016) in India.…”
Section: Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%