The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles

Abstract

Despite growing interest in Open Access (OA) to scholarly literature, there is an unmet need for large-scale, up-to-date, and reproducible studies assessing the prevalence and characteristics of OA. We address this need using oaDOI, an open online service that determines OA status for 67 million articles. We use three samples, each of 100,000 articles, to investigate OA in three populations: (1) all journal articles assigned a Crossref DOI, (2) recent journal articles indexed in Web of Science, and (3) articles viewed by users of Unpaywall, an open-source browser extension that lets users find OA articles using oaDOI. We estimate that at least 28% of the scholarly literature is OA (19M in total) and that this proportion is growing, driven particularly by growth in Gold and Hybrid. The most recent year analyzed (2015) also has the highest percentage of OA (45%). Because of this growth, and the fact that readers disproportionately access newer articles, we find that Unpaywall users encounter OA quite frequently: 47% of articles they view are OA. Notably, the most common mechanism for OA is not Gold, Green, or Hybrid OA, but rather an under-discussed category we dub Bronze: articles made free-to-read on the publisher website, without an explicit Open license. We also examine the citation impact of OA articles, corroborating the so-called open-access citation advantage: accounting for age and discipline, OA articles receive 18% more citations than average, an effect driven primarily by Green and Hybrid OA. We encourage further research using the free oaDOI service, as a way to inform OA policy and practice.

Twelve years of access to electronic serials in Russia: Results and perspectives

“…The proportion of OA journals in subscribed resources under consideration is much lower than for other publishers (Table 4) and differs greatly for certain ESI research areas. This data coincides with the data on different types of OA across publishers and disciplines in [35]. The proportion of OA journals for different research areas is to be taken into account while selecting the resources for subscription.…”

Open season: positive changes for increased transparency in the biomedical literature

“…Although open access manuscripts are increasingly a component of the literature, 18 many research papers are still hidden to most people since they require payment to be viewed. This suboptimal situation presents several problems.…”

Imagining the ‘open’ university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education

“…Studies up to 2012 [35] and 2015 [10] put the estimate around 22-24%, 81 though this number is likely to vary with discipline. A new study by Piwowar et al estimates that overall 82 28% of the academic literature is free to access online, and though that number is growing, it was only 45% 83 as of 2015 [36]. A study by the World Health Organization demonstrates the scope of the problem [37]: 84 " In the lowest-income countries, 56 percent of the institutions had no current subscriptions to international journals and 21 percent had an average of only two journal subscriptions.…”