2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/ab3af0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The statistical mechanics of Twitter communities

Abstract: We build models for the distribution of social states in Twitter communities. States can be defined by the participation vs silence of individuals in conversations that surround key words, and we approximate the joint distribution of these binary variables using the maximum entropy principle, finding the least structured models that match the mean probability of individuals tweeting and their pairwise correlations. These models provide very accurate, quantitative descriptions of higher order structure in these… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with the MVM, this community contains multiple pivotal members but wide variation in the strength of their subspace eigenvalues. Twitter communities may be on average sensitive to the behavior a few individuals regardless of identity (17), but this individual-level variation suggests that collective behavior may be much more sensitive to a select Twitter users even within smaller communities (30). Going beyond the detailed few examples in Figure 4, we find large diversity within political institutions that highlights the important role of heterogeneity in social institutions, heterogeneity that is captured in the information geometry of minimal, maxent models.…”
Section: Pivotal Components In Societymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast with the MVM, this community contains multiple pivotal members but wide variation in the strength of their subspace eigenvalues. Twitter communities may be on average sensitive to the behavior a few individuals regardless of identity (17), but this individual-level variation suggests that collective behavior may be much more sensitive to a select Twitter users even within smaller communities (30). Going beyond the detailed few examples in Figure 4, we find large diversity within political institutions that highlights the important role of heterogeneity in social institutions, heterogeneity that is captured in the information geometry of minimal, maxent models.…”
Section: Pivotal Components In Societymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…California (CA) state legislatures (15), US federal legislatures (16), and communities on Twitter (17). Across these examples, we find large diversity: ranging from examples of median-like systems, with pivotal voters or components, to other examples in which no special component emerges.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, we perform a survey across multiple systems in society including examples of judicial voting across US state high courts [14], California (CA) state legislatures [15], US federal legislatures [16], and communities on Twitter [17]. Across these examples, we find large diversity ranging from examples of median-like systems, with pivotal components, to other examples in which no special component emerges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%