The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data. Part I: The wind field

Abstract

This paper analyses the statistical structure of the errors of the short-range wind forecasts used in the global data assimilation system at ECMWF, by verifying the forecasts against radiosonde data over North America. The kinematics of two-dimensional homogeneous turbulence is used to partition the perceived forecast errors into prediction errors which are horizontally correlated, and observational errors which are assumed to be horizontally uncorrelated. The theory further partitions the wind prediction errors into three components, viz. large-scale, rotational and divergent components, and provides a spectral description of the covariance and crosscovariance functions for stream function and velocity potential. The calculations also provide an estimate of the vertical error covariance matrices for prediction error and for radiosonde observational error, by which we mean the combined effects of instrumental error and errors of representativeness. The basic assumptions are that the forecast errors are horizontally homogeneous and that the observational errors are horizontally uncorrelated.Several important results are found. The wind prediction errors are comparable in magnitude with the wind observation errors. The prediction errors are dominated by the synoptic scales, but there is a substantial large scale wind error which reverses phase between the stratosphere and troposphere. The synoptic scale errors are largely non-divergent in the troposphere. There are good grounds for increasing the resolution of the analysis system, both in the horizontal and the vertical, over North America and other data-rich regions.

Three‐dimensional ozone data analysis with an air quality model over the Paris area

“…In contrast, covariance c t,h b (s k , s) between a monitoring station location s k and any location s, where there is generally no available measurements, needs to be computed through a covariance model. To construct this model, we use the observational method [Hollingsworth and Lönnberg, 1986]. It consists in assuming that (1) the forecasting system is ergodic, and then the error statistics can be obtained from an average over a long time sequence of innovations (2) c t,h b (s k , s l ) is homogeneous and isotropic.…”

Subsurface geostrophic velocities inference from altimeter data: Application to the Sicily Channel (Mediterranean Sea)

“…the initial 'forecast', or 'background' analysis) is generally given by an average of the observations (such as a climatological mean) and not by a numerical model. The error associated to this first guess is thus simply the signal we want to resolve, and the background error covariance, in turn, is reduced to the observed covariance, often estimated through the Hollingsworth-Lonnberg method [Hollingsworth and Lonnberg, 1986].…”

Bio‐Optical Data Assimilation With Observational Error Covariance Derived From an Ensemble of Satellite Images

“…Representation errors are errors associated with the incomplete representation of the observed quantity by the model due to: model resolution and the resolution of observing network, processes not handled by the model, discrete approximation of the observational operator (see, e.g., Oke & Sakov, 2007). Although extensive work has been done estimating these errors and corresponding error covariance for physical and atmospheric data sources, they are still difficult to quantify (Bormann & Bauer, 2010;Desroziers et al, 2005;Hollingsworth & Lonnberg, 1986;Oke & Sakov, 2007).…”