1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(98)00103-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The status of Anaecypris hispanica in Portugal: Problems of conserving a highly endangered Iberian fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These movements are probably two-fold: (i) migration of mature fish upstream to reproduce, followed by (ii) downstream dispersion, especially of larger individuals, to avoid the harsh drought conditions and being caught in the poor water quality conditions experienced in the few remaining permanent pools (Collares- Pereira et al, 1999;Pires et al, 1999). Cobitis paludica and Leuciscus pyrenaicus seem to occupy the same areas throughout the year, suggesting individuals probably do not move for the reasons given earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These movements are probably two-fold: (i) migration of mature fish upstream to reproduce, followed by (ii) downstream dispersion, especially of larger individuals, to avoid the harsh drought conditions and being caught in the poor water quality conditions experienced in the few remaining permanent pools (Collares- Pereira et al, 1999;Pires et al, 1999). Cobitis paludica and Leuciscus pyrenaicus seem to occupy the same areas throughout the year, suggesting individuals probably do not move for the reasons given earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species was introduced in many countries, such as Portugal (Colares-Pereira et al 1999), Spain (Elvira and Almodóvar 2001), Italy (Orrù et al 2010), Czech Republic (Musil et al 2010), Kenya (Britton and Harper 2006), Mozambique (Weyl and Hecht 1999), Japan (Takamura 2007), and South Korea (Lee et al 2010), due to its qualities, which make it suitable for sport-fishing. In Brazil, M. salmoides was introduced in Belo Horizonte, in 1922, for aquaculture purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species was introduced for sport-fishing purposes in many countries like Japan (Yodo & Kimura, 1996), Kenya (Aloo & Dadzie, 1995), Mozambique (Weyl & Hecht, 1999), Italy (Lorenzoni et al, 2002), Spain (Elvia & Almodóvar, 2001), and Portugal (Colares-Pereira et al, 1999). In almost all of such countries, undesirable side effects on native fauna have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%