2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2719-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Status of Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urdu case markers are syntactic clitics (Butt and Sadler, 2003) and divided into different forms by Butt and King (2004) e.g., ergative, accusative, dative, possessive, etc. All Urdu case markers are annotated with a simple CM tag at POS level.…”
Section: Case Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Urdu case markers are syntactic clitics (Butt and Sadler, 2003) and divided into different forms by Butt and King (2004) e.g., ergative, accusative, dative, possessive, etc. All Urdu case markers are annotated with a simple CM tag at POS level.…”
Section: Case Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The syntactic differentiation of the case markers is done according to the studies in Butt and King (2004).…”
Section: Employment Of Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An abstract location can be identified through a spatial case marker (as discussed) and also through dative case marker. A dative case marker [9] can also be used to identify experiencer/SUB having some experience/PRD in a copular construction as given in example sentence 13. The respective c & f structures are depicted in figure 10.…”
Section: Attributive Copulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these rules produce multiple categories for each word and hence multiple inflections which require · 15: 23 a separate model to perform disambiguation. The quality of these rules is superior as they are modeled based on the Urdu grammar analysis done by well known grammarians, Butt and King [2004] and Siddiqi [1971]. We used a variation of the work of Humayoun et al [2007] to develop our Urdu morphological analyzer.…”
Section: Morphological Analyzermentioning
confidence: 99%