2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stefan problem with variable thermophysical properties and phase change temperature

Abstract: In this paper we formulate a Stefan problem appropriate when the thermophysical properties are distinct in each phase and the phase-change temperature is size or velocity dependent. Thermophysical properties invariably take different values in different material phases but this is often ignored for mathematical simplicity. Size and velocity dependent phase change temperatures are often found at very short length scales, such as nanoparticle melting or dendrite formation; velocity dependence occurs in the solid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cooling process of water droplets has been studied by different authors over the years [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. In the present work, a basic heat balance model is used to obtain the rate at which the temperature of a droplet varies over time, assuming that the particle integrates a thermodynamic system in which heat transfer takes place from the droplet to the surrounding environment and vice versa.…”
Section: Cooling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooling process of water droplets has been studied by different authors over the years [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. In the present work, a basic heat balance model is used to obtain the rate at which the temperature of a droplet varies over time, assuming that the particle integrates a thermodynamic system in which heat transfer takes place from the droplet to the surrounding environment and vice versa.…”
Section: Cooling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unsteady behavior of a PCM melting in a cylindrical shell and tube LHTES system with moving interface boundary conditions and constant inner tube temperature is captured through an analytical approach. The melting of PCM is assumed to be dominated by conduction heat transfer and the effect of gravity and the viscous effect is considered negligible 28,29 . However, this assumption can be supported by the fact that if the tube wall is stagnantly hot and transferring heat to PCM at a constant temperature, heat flow is primarily governed by thermal conduction 30 .…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The melting of PCM is assumed to be dominated by conduction heat transfer and the effect of gravity and the viscous effect is considered negligible. 28,29 However, this assumption can be supported by the fact that if the tube wall is stagnantly hot and transferring heat to PCM at a constant temperature, heat flow is primarily governed by thermal conduction. 30 Furthermore, when a small amount of PCM is charged inside a closed container, conduction is the dominating mode of heat transfer.…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ∆H f is the latent heat of solidification. The term ∝ (ds/dt) 2 in ( 7) is the kinetic energy contribution at the interface due to the bulk liquid motion [1,13,33]. The system is closed with the initial conditions…”
Section: Continuum Solidification Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%