2018
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egy024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stillwater Complex: Integrating Zircon Geochronological and Geochemical Constraints on the Age, Emplacement History and Crystallization of a Large, Open-System Layered Intrusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
56
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
4
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the Main Anorthosite Layer shares many similarities with the Anorthosite zones in the Middle Banded Series of the Stillwater Complex as these anorthosites are older than the underlying rock sequences, which also host the J-M Reef. This was interpreted to suggest an out-of-sequence emplacement of the Stillwater Complex, which could also apply to the Fedorova-Pana Complex [42]. Geological relationships coupled with U-Pb dating of the Main Anorthosite Layer suggest that the layer crystallized coevally with the adjacent rocks of the ULH, but earlier than the LLH and other rocks from the lower portions of the West-Pana intrusion (Figures 2 and 8).…”
Section: U-pb Age Of the Main Anorthosite Layer And Crystallization Hmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, the Main Anorthosite Layer shares many similarities with the Anorthosite zones in the Middle Banded Series of the Stillwater Complex as these anorthosites are older than the underlying rock sequences, which also host the J-M Reef. This was interpreted to suggest an out-of-sequence emplacement of the Stillwater Complex, which could also apply to the Fedorova-Pana Complex [42]. Geological relationships coupled with U-Pb dating of the Main Anorthosite Layer suggest that the layer crystallized coevally with the adjacent rocks of the ULH, but earlier than the LLH and other rocks from the lower portions of the West-Pana intrusion (Figures 2 and 8).…”
Section: U-pb Age Of the Main Anorthosite Layer And Crystallization Hmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Notably, the Main Anorthosite Layer shares many similarities with the Anorthosite zones in the Middle Banded Series of the Stillwater Complex as these anorthosites are older than the underlying rock sequences, which also host the J-M Reef. This was interpreted to suggest an out-of-sequence emplacement of the Stillwater Complex, which could also apply to the Fedorova-Pana Complex [42]. Table 2 for references; C, mean 207 Pb/ 206 Pb age or concordia age.…”
Section: U-pb Age Of the Main Anorthosite Layer And Crystallization Hmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of systematic relationships between the thickness of the mafic and leucocratic portions of the units (e.g., [12]) is also observed at Karee, but can be related to the non-genetic relationship between the rocks in the Merensky Unit. Apparent out-of-sequence ages, derived from U-Pb dating of zircon and baddeleyite in the Bushveld Complex [3] and the Stillwater Complex, USA [93], have also been used. These minerals, however, crystallise very close to the solidus in the last pockets of melt [93].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Role Of Intrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparent out-of-sequence ages, derived from U-Pb dating of zircon and baddeleyite in the Bushveld Complex [3] and the Stillwater Complex, USA [93], have also been used. These minerals, however, crystallise very close to the solidus in the last pockets of melt [93]. The temperature of zircon crystallization in the Stillwater Complex (Ti-in-Zircon method) overlaps with the temperature of the country rocks in the contact aureole [93] suggesting that these ages may reflect protracted cooling times rather than the first stages in the development of the rocks.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Role Of Intrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%