2016
DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Strategic Shuffle: Ethnic Geography, the Internal Security Apparatus, and Elections in Kenya

Abstract: For autocrats facing elections, officers in the internal security apparatus play a crucial role by engaging in coercion on behalf of the incumbent. Yet reliance on these officers introduces a principal-agent problem: Officers can shirk from the autocrat's demands. To solve this problem, autocrats strategically post officers to different areas based on an area's importance to the election and the expected loyalty of an individual officer, which is a function of the officer's expected benefits from the president… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, from a human rights perspective, studies examine how governments structure their security apparatus to ensure repressive compliance (Hassan 2017); deter threats from coups (Svolik 2012); and evade responsibility for human rights abuses (Cohen and Nordås 2015, Curtice 2018, DeMeritt 2012, Mitchell, Carey and Butler 2014. For example, in autocracies, coercive institutions are "a dictator's final defense in pursuit of political survival, but also (the government's) chief obstacle to achieving that goal" (Greitens 2016).…”
Section: Politics Of Repressing and Policingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, from a human rights perspective, studies examine how governments structure their security apparatus to ensure repressive compliance (Hassan 2017); deter threats from coups (Svolik 2012); and evade responsibility for human rights abuses (Cohen and Nordås 2015, Curtice 2018, DeMeritt 2012, Mitchell, Carey and Butler 2014. For example, in autocracies, coercive institutions are "a dictator's final defense in pursuit of political survival, but also (the government's) chief obstacle to achieving that goal" (Greitens 2016).…”
Section: Politics Of Repressing and Policingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In autocracies, police are an extension of the state and controlled by the autocrat to repress political opponents and threats from below (Hassan 2017, Wantchekon 2002. We expect support for the ruling party to act as a potential moderator to the backlash effects.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sierra and Titecay (2016) sheds light on illicit rent-sharing agreements between lower and senior ranks of the traffic police in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Sharing our focus on ethnic politics in Kenya, Hassan (2017) provides evidence on how political interference perverted the purpose of the police. She finds that co-ethnic police officers were strategically placed to swing constituencies in the 1992 and 1997 Kenyan elections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is the long-term effect of state-sponsored violence on authoritarian rulers' legitimacy? Autocrats use repression to maintain political order, promote economic development, and lengthen their term in office (Haggard 1986;Davenport 1995; Bueno de Mesquita and Smith 2011; Svolik 2012; Bhasin and Gandhi 2013;Greitens 2016;Hassan 2016). Many autocracies remain robust facing societal challenges thanks to coercion (Bellin 2004;Levitsky and Way 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%