2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00347.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning

Abstract: Social software is increasingly being used in higher and further education to support teaching and learning processes. These applications provide students with social and cognitive stimulation and also add to the interaction between students and educators. However, in addition to the benefits the introduction of social software into a course environment can also have adverse implications on students, educators and the education institution as a whole, a phenomenon which has received much less attention in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
155
1
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
155
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We recommend the adoption of active and social learning frameworks-in conjunction with collaborative tools such as Slack-to assist faculty in enhancing communication and collaboration among students and instructors, building meaningful social relationships among students in online courses, and improving learning outcomes (Schroeder, Minocha, and Schneider 2010). In combining active and social learning exercises with a nimble online-learning environment, our students demonstrated an ongoing engagement with the course, its material, and the larger political world.…”
Section: Overcoming the Communications Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recommend the adoption of active and social learning frameworks-in conjunction with collaborative tools such as Slack-to assist faculty in enhancing communication and collaboration among students and instructors, building meaningful social relationships among students in online courses, and improving learning outcomes (Schroeder, Minocha, and Schneider 2010). In combining active and social learning exercises with a nimble online-learning environment, our students demonstrated an ongoing engagement with the course, its material, and the larger political world.…”
Section: Overcoming the Communications Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre los puntos negativos respecto a su uso están el reducido porcentaje de alumnos que finalmente son participativos frente a una mayoría de mirones (Ebner, 2009;Kop, 2011;Rinaldo, Tapp y Laverie, 2011;Ros et al, 2011); los riesgos de privacidad y mal uso (Rinaldo, Tapp. y Laverie, 2011); la sobrecarga de trabajo para el profesor y para el estudiante (Schroeder, Minocha y Schneider, 2010). Uno de los problemas apuntados por la mayoría de los autores se refiere a la dificultad del diseño de las iniciativas sociales con fines pedagógicos y de la evaluación de los contenidos y aprendizaje obtenido por los estudiantes (Gray et al, 2010).…”
Section: Desventajasunclassified
“…On the other hand, in SNSs is difficult to keep the concentration on the topic with the communication drifts. Several studies have been done on LMSs and their insufficiency in providing social experience and failure to support personalization that is afforded by SNSs (DeSchryver et al, 2009;Naveh et al, 2010;Schroeder et al, 2010;Veletsianos and Navarrete, 2012). Further studies, some of which are discussed below, highlighted the positive impact of using social networking in education to support learners' collaboration, sharing ideas, creating products, and constructing identities (Dron and Anderson, 2009b;Greenhow, 2011;Greenhow and Robelia, 2009;Irwin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%