2009
DOI: 10.1177/1088868308329378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Strong Situation Hypothesis

Abstract: A conventional wisdom in personality and social psychology and organizational behavior is that personality matters most in weak situations and least in strong situations. The authors trace the origins of this claim and examine the evidence for the personality-dampening effect of strong situations. The authors identify the gap between claim and evidence and suggest an agenda for future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
270
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
16
270
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, recent research from cognitive psychology suggests a dynamic constructivist approach to culture (Hong et al, 2000;Molinski, 2007), allowing for even intra-individual cultural variation. The more contextual view of culture is in line with thinking in psychology on the interaction of the situation/context with the individual (see, e.g., Cooper & Withey, 2009) as compared with the more automatic and reflexive view (see, e.g., Wyer, 2014).…”
Section: The Characterization Of Culturementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, recent research from cognitive psychology suggests a dynamic constructivist approach to culture (Hong et al, 2000;Molinski, 2007), allowing for even intra-individual cultural variation. The more contextual view of culture is in line with thinking in psychology on the interaction of the situation/context with the individual (see, e.g., Cooper & Withey, 2009) as compared with the more automatic and reflexive view (see, e.g., Wyer, 2014).…”
Section: The Characterization Of Culturementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Meyer et al (2010) point out that much of the widelycited research has been in a laboratory setting, perhaps using scenarios and expected rather than actual responses; and Cooper and Withey (2009) conclude from their review that the "transformation from hypothesis to dogma is based more on the plausibility of the [situational strength] hypothesis and sheer repetition than on any empirical evidence" (p.64).…”
Section: Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework has been widely accepted by researchers in many areas, although empirical support has largely derived from laboratory investigations and many findings have not been positive (Cooper & Withey, 2009;Meyer, Dalal, & Hermida, 2010). Mischel's definitional emphasis was on consensus versus variability in perceptions, but his construct of strength has since been measured in very different ways -through "a host of ad hoc operationalizations" (Meyer et al, 2010, p. 122).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is likely ambiguity in the potential health outcomes for most patients, e.g., some high cholesterol patients will develop heart disease but other will not. In these weaker situations, personality will play a larger role in driving behavior (Cooper & Withey, 2009).…”
Section: Personality and Health Response 17mentioning
confidence: 99%