2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10443-020-09822-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structural Integrity of Composite Materials and Long-Life Implementation of Composite Structures

Peter W. R. Beaumont

Abstract: Empirical or semi-empirical design methodologies at the macroscopic scale (structural level) can be supported and justified only by a fundamental understanding at the lower (microscopic) size scale through the physical model. Today structural integrity (SI) is thought as the optimisation of microstructure by controlling processing coupled with intelligent manufacturing of the material: to maximise mechanical performance and ensure reliability of the large scale structure; and to avoid calamity and misfortune. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all sorts of operational conditions, detailed information about crack initiation points, mechanical behavior of material and sustainable structural integrity across a wide spectrum of the size scale are required. Thus empirical or semi‐empirical design methodologies at a structural level can only be supported and justified by microscopic size scale by physical modelling 37 . Since the strength of the component depends on the strength of the weakest location.…”
Section: Challenges Associated With Composite Component Design With Holementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For all sorts of operational conditions, detailed information about crack initiation points, mechanical behavior of material and sustainable structural integrity across a wide spectrum of the size scale are required. Thus empirical or semi‐empirical design methodologies at a structural level can only be supported and justified by microscopic size scale by physical modelling 37 . Since the strength of the component depends on the strength of the weakest location.…”
Section: Challenges Associated With Composite Component Design With Holementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus empirical or semi-empirical design methodologies at a structural level can only be supported and justified by microscopic size scale by physical modelling. 37 Since the strength of the component depends on the strength of the weakest location. In the case of a composite component with a hole, the location around the hole is the weakest.…”
Section: Challenges Associated With Composite Component Design With Holementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facecore interfacial debonding is a critical issue that causes the failure of sandwich structures 6,7 ; this is because debonding at the adhered regions between the facesheets and the core may occur due to manufacturing flaws or in-service damage. [8][9][10][11] Debonded regions can lead to crack growth, strength and stiffness reduction, and failure. The flexural rigidity, stiffness and strength reductions are more significant for a longer debonded region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the fibre, matrix, and interface are the three main components of the composite [25]. To optimize the coupling between the two phases and therefore allow stresses to be dispersed over the matrix and hence transferred to the reinforcement, the interface between the fibre and the matrix must have sufficient chemical and physical bonding stability [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%