2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structural response of graphene on copper to surface- and interfacial-oxygen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these graphene materials for composite applications possess defects and oxygen-containing functional groups (OCFGs) introduced from raw materials or the preparation process, which would make them more reactive than perfect graphene and thus impacts the interfacial structure and bonding state between graphene and metals remarkably . During the high-temperature fabrication process of MMCs, the activated oxygen atoms obtaining energy from Joule heat are driven out of the graphene surface and move toward the interface and even possibly diffuse into the metal bulk as a result of differential oxygen concentration between metal and graphene . In the meantime, the local stress resulting from the restriction of matrix plastic deformation by the graphene reinforcement also makes the interfacial condition even more complex. To clarify the interfacial bonding between these “defected graphene” and metal matrix, a comprehensive consideration of the existence type and formation mechanisms of the defects and oxygen element in the graphene and their potential interfacial reaction is very necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these graphene materials for composite applications possess defects and oxygen-containing functional groups (OCFGs) introduced from raw materials or the preparation process, which would make them more reactive than perfect graphene and thus impacts the interfacial structure and bonding state between graphene and metals remarkably . During the high-temperature fabrication process of MMCs, the activated oxygen atoms obtaining energy from Joule heat are driven out of the graphene surface and move toward the interface and even possibly diffuse into the metal bulk as a result of differential oxygen concentration between metal and graphene . In the meantime, the local stress resulting from the restriction of matrix plastic deformation by the graphene reinforcement also makes the interfacial condition even more complex. To clarify the interfacial bonding between these “defected graphene” and metal matrix, a comprehensive consideration of the existence type and formation mechanisms of the defects and oxygen element in the graphene and their potential interfacial reaction is very necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minor contaminations revealed by weak O 1s (core level in Figure S1 , Supporting Information) line in the XPS spectrum (obtained without vacuum sample annealing) were analyzed by the near edge X‐ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy. [ 40 ] These trace contaminants of various carbon bonds (regions marked by dashed rectangles in Figure 2c,d ) can be removed by a 300 °C annealing in ultra‐high vacuum conditions. Remarkably, Cu L 2,3 ‐edge signal (Figure 2e ), indicative of pure metallic copper [ 41 ] only weakly interacting with graphene, does not change during annealing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%