2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jc014042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structure and Entrainment Characteristics of Partially Confined Gravity Currents

Abstract: Seafloor channels are the main conduit for turbidity currents transporting sediment to the deep ocean, and they can extend for thousands of kilometers along the ocean floor. Although it is common for channel‐traversing turbidity currents to spill onto levees and other out‐of‐channel areas, the associated flow development and channel‐current interaction remain poorly understood; much of our knowledge of turbidity current dynamics comes from studies of fully confined scenarios. Here we investigate the role that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic down-channel decrease in the magnitude and velocity of overspill from the Hikurangi Channel is attributed to the process of flow 'tuning'. This arises from the loss of material from the dilute, upper parts of flows in up-channel locations, causing the range of flow heights to decrease down-channel as flows progressively lose material, with thicker flows losing more than thinner-ones (Figure 21C; Mohrig and Buttles 2007;Kelly et al 2019). Flow tuning has generated a down-channel decrease in the size of the outer-bend wave fields (Figure 22).…”
Section: Flow 'Tuning'mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic down-channel decrease in the magnitude and velocity of overspill from the Hikurangi Channel is attributed to the process of flow 'tuning'. This arises from the loss of material from the dilute, upper parts of flows in up-channel locations, causing the range of flow heights to decrease down-channel as flows progressively lose material, with thicker flows losing more than thinner-ones (Figure 21C; Mohrig and Buttles 2007;Kelly et al 2019). Flow tuning has generated a down-channel decrease in the size of the outer-bend wave fields (Figure 22).…”
Section: Flow 'Tuning'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have led to the development of models of overbank flow and architecture evolution in which progressive trends of diminishing grain size (typically from fine sand to mud) and deposit thickness are seen in transects away from the levee crest (Kane et al 2007;Morris et al 2014). However, these simple trends may be complicated by the influence of factors such as: variations in the size of turbidity currents relative to their host conduit (Dennielou et al 2006), flow 'tuning' (Mohrig and Buttles 2007;Kelly et al 2019), variations in overbank slope gradient (Kane et al 2010;Nakajima and Kneller 2013), sinuosity (Timbrell 1993;Kane et al 2008), structural confinement (Clark and Cartwright 2011), the Coriolis force (Klaucke et al 1998;Cossu et al 2015), and contour currents (Fuhrmann et al 2020;Miramontes et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models, derived by time-averaging of the governing equations, have been applied to the simulation of dilute gravity currents with both fixed and deformable boundaries. [27][28][29][30][31][32] Although RANS models are far less computationally expensive than DNS models, which has enabled the simulation of environmental scale flows, the inherent averaging of the governing equations reduces the accuracy with which they can capture the complex time-dependent turbulent flow features of gravity currents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%