1974
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740874004006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of bis-(3,5-dimethyl-1,2-dithiolium) tetrachloroferrate(II): a comparison of structural details derived from two independent diffractometer analyses

Abstract: We wish to thank Dr E. R. Clark of the Pharmacology Department of Leeds University for valuable discussions, Mr D. Akrigg for technical assistance and the Leeds University Computing Laboratory for the provision of computing facilities.Note added in proof:-The structure of TM1 has been congrmed as TTTT. The structure of ome TM1 has recently been determined as TTGT (manuscripts in preparntion).References CHOTHIA, C. t~ PAULING, P. (1969) Results from two independent X-ray diffraction studies are discussed. Both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C−S bond lengths in 4d of 163.7(3) and 166.4(3) pm are shorter than in the 4‐( p ‐dimethylaminophenyl)‐2,6‐diphenyl thiopyrylium cation (171 and 172 pm),16 and also shorter than in thiophene (171.4 pm) 17. They are quite similar to the related 1,3‐dithiolium ion (167.6 and 168.1 pm)18 and the 3,5‐dimethyl‐1,2‐dithiolium ion (166.7 and 169.6 pm) 19. C−S single bonds such as those in (CH 3 ) 2 S (180.2 pm)20 and a 1,3‐dithiol (182 pm) are longer,18 whilst C−S double bonds such as those in H 2 C=S (161.1 pm)21 and CH 2 =SF 4 (155.4 pm)22 and triple bonds as in CF 3 −C≡SF 3 (142 pm)23 are markedly shorter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The C−S bond lengths in 4d of 163.7(3) and 166.4(3) pm are shorter than in the 4‐( p ‐dimethylaminophenyl)‐2,6‐diphenyl thiopyrylium cation (171 and 172 pm),16 and also shorter than in thiophene (171.4 pm) 17. They are quite similar to the related 1,3‐dithiolium ion (167.6 and 168.1 pm)18 and the 3,5‐dimethyl‐1,2‐dithiolium ion (166.7 and 169.6 pm) 19. C−S single bonds such as those in (CH 3 ) 2 S (180.2 pm)20 and a 1,3‐dithiol (182 pm) are longer,18 whilst C−S double bonds such as those in H 2 C=S (161.1 pm)21 and CH 2 =SF 4 (155.4 pm)22 and triple bonds as in CF 3 −C≡SF 3 (142 pm)23 are markedly shorter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%