2009
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2009.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of JIBS's social network and the relevance of intra-country variation: A typology for future research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an emphasis on these ties makes social network theory appropriate for the study of co-citations. Using this approach, nodes represent influential scholarly works joined by the co-citations made in published research (Chabowski et al 2010).…”
Section: Social Network Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an emphasis on these ties makes social network theory appropriate for the study of co-citations. Using this approach, nodes represent influential scholarly works joined by the co-citations made in published research (Chabowski et al 2010).…”
Section: Social Network Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our central theoretical issue therefore concerns the effects of sub‐national institutional contexts (province‐level comparisons in our context) on the relative values of different domestic firm network positions during the process of IJV partner selection (Chabowski et al., 2010). We contribute to the literature on partner selection in emerging economies though integrating both the social network and institution‐based perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of a recent study of the structure of JIBS' 'social networks' (Chabowski et al 2010) parallel these findings. In their early period, 1976-1986, the MNE is associated with 'competitiveness', 'theory', and 'foreign investment'; in their latter period, 1998-2008, it is associated with concepts such as 'knowledge development', 'transaction costs', 'international production', and 'resource advantage'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%