1974
DOI: 10.1016/0094-5765(74)90100-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of marginal detonation waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the detonation front is strengthened near the cell apex and reaches its maximum intensity at about 0.1l, and then decays till the end of the cell. The decaying process calculated by our new model is in good agreement with the experiments (Strehlow and Crook 1974;Hanana et al 2000). However, the reported second pressure jump at 0.7l, which is consequence of collision of two transverse waves, can not be predicted by our model.…”
Section: Dynamic Process In a Cellsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the detonation front is strengthened near the cell apex and reaches its maximum intensity at about 0.1l, and then decays till the end of the cell. The decaying process calculated by our new model is in good agreement with the experiments (Strehlow and Crook 1974;Hanana et al 2000). However, the reported second pressure jump at 0.7l, which is consequence of collision of two transverse waves, can not be predicted by our model.…”
Section: Dynamic Process In a Cellsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Lundstrom and Oppenheim (1969), Strehlow (1970Strehlow ( , 1971, Strehlow et al (1972), Strehlow and Crook (1974) and Urtiew (1976) analyzed two-dimensional cellular detonation waves and found that the detonation velocity and pressure reach their maximum values just after the tripleshock collision, and then decay continuously until their minimum values are reached at the end of the detonation cell. However, the pressure fluctuations along the cell centerline, obtained in the experiments of VMT (Voitsekhovsky et al 1963), suggested that detonation states close to the collision point could not be resolved because the area is too small to put in a probe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is the same as that of Bourlioux and Majda (1992) and very close to the grid resolution that have been used by Sharpe (2001) and Sharpe and Quirk (2008). Before going to the next section, it is important to point out that both experimental observations (Strehlow and Crooker, 1974) and numerical simulations (Gamezo et al, 1999). indicate that the leading shock velocity varies inside a detonation cell.…”
Section: Grid Resolution Studysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…(Gross and Chinitz, 1960), (Nicholls, 1963), (Rubins and Rhodes, 1963), (Behrens, et al, 1965), (Strehlow, 1968), (Strehlow and Crooker, 1974), (Lehr, 1972), and (Liu, et al, 1986). Of potential relevance, especially in light of Dunlap et al's concern, are dramatic observations of one-and three-dimensional detonation instabilities.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3: Sketch of observed combustion instability in projectile firing experiment, adopted from photographs of Lehr, 1972. Figure 4: Sketch of observed patterns on smoke-coated foils after passage of an unstable detonation wave, adopted from photographs of Strehlow and Crooker, 1974.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%