1964
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(64)90230-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of orf virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
2

Year Published

1966
1966
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fibers appeared to be oriented parallel to the virion surface ( Fig. 1 and 2), an observation consistent with both the "short railroad tracks" surface topography described by Heuser (20) and the very notable ropelike helical surface fibers of parapoxvirus (46,48,49,55). Although somewhat cytoskeletal in appearance, the mode of depolymerization of these SFEs, i.e., primarily under reducing conditions, would seem atypical for common cellular cytoskeletal proteins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The fibers appeared to be oriented parallel to the virion surface ( Fig. 1 and 2), an observation consistent with both the "short railroad tracks" surface topography described by Heuser (20) and the very notable ropelike helical surface fibers of parapoxvirus (46,48,49,55). Although somewhat cytoskeletal in appearance, the mode of depolymerization of these SFEs, i.e., primarily under reducing conditions, would seem atypical for common cellular cytoskeletal proteins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…These features distinguish parapoxviruses from other poxviruses. 7,18,24 Inoculation of MDOK cell cultures with clarified skin homogenates resulted in CPE suggestive of orf virus infection. 14 Orf virus-specific DNA was readily amplified by PCR from these cells but not from cultures of negative controls or from MDOK cells cocultivated with PBMN or LNMN cells obtained from the affected goat kids, indicating that orf virus is not associated with these cells in chronic infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virusspecific antibodies in sera are routinely used to indicate exposure to virus and it is therefore important to have a serological assay for the differention of CPV and CPDV infections. The viruses can easily be differentiated from each other by electron microscopy [6], and genomic comparison [7]. However, a major common precipitating antigen shown to be present in strains of CPV also reacts with CPDV positive serum [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%