1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00139228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of (self-) consciousness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to self-representationalism, conscious states are those that are represented, not by higher-order thoughts or perception-like states, but simply by themselves (Smith, 1986;Caston, 2002;Kriegel, 2003a). Their being represented at all makes us aware of them, and their being represented by themselves, rather than by separate higher-order states, makes the awareness unmediated in a very straightforward sense.…”
Section: The Cross-order Integration Theory Of Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to self-representationalism, conscious states are those that are represented, not by higher-order thoughts or perception-like states, but simply by themselves (Smith, 1986;Caston, 2002;Kriegel, 2003a). Their being represented at all makes us aware of them, and their being represented by themselves, rather than by separate higher-order states, makes the awareness unmediated in a very straightforward sense.…”
Section: The Cross-order Integration Theory Of Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8. For close interpretations of Brentano along these lines, see Smith (1986Smith ( , 1989, Zahavi (1998aZahavi ( , 1999, Thomasson (2000) and Kriegel (2003aKriegel ( , 2003b. 9.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. See Smith (1986), Rosenthal (1986Rosenthal ( , 2002a, Lycan (1996), Carruthers (2000) and Levine (2001).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, andSturma 1995). More recently, it has been defended by Smith (1986Smith ( , 1989, Thomasson (2000), Hossack (2002) and Caston (2002). It is impossible to review this literature here.…”
Section: Conclusion: a New Solution To Moore's Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%