2014
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Subthalamic Nucleus Influences Visuospatial Attention in Humans

Abstract: Spatial attention is a lateralized feature of the human brain. Whereas the role of cortical areas of the nondominant hemisphere on spatial attention has been investigated in detail, the impact of the BG, and more precisely the subthalamic nucleus, on signs and symptoms of spatial attention is not well understood. Here we used unilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus to reversibly, specifically, and intraindividually modify the neuronal BG outflow and its consequences on signs and symptoms o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Lohnes and Earhart 7 showed that STN-DBS in PD patients shortened their turn duration, whereas it also improved saccadic functions that are important for turning. 7 STN-DBS has also been shown to improve visuospatial attention 14 and decrease intersegmental latencies (e.g., eye–head, eye–foot, and head–trunk), which are both affected in PD patients, especially in those that experience freezing. 7,15 However, though these studies provide valuable information regarding the STN’s role, little information exists about other regions of the brain that are likely to be involved in the functional impairments that cause turning difficulties and FOG in PD patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Lohnes and Earhart 7 showed that STN-DBS in PD patients shortened their turn duration, whereas it also improved saccadic functions that are important for turning. 7 STN-DBS has also been shown to improve visuospatial attention 14 and decrease intersegmental latencies (e.g., eye–head, eye–foot, and head–trunk), which are both affected in PD patients, especially in those that experience freezing. 7,15 However, though these studies provide valuable information regarding the STN’s role, little information exists about other regions of the brain that are likely to be involved in the functional impairments that cause turning difficulties and FOG in PD patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less sleepiness might be related to a postoperative reduction of medication. Positive effects of DBS on orientation could be possible, as recently DBS of the STN has been shown to modulate spatial attention [ 14 ]. One patient reported to have quit driving postoperatively due to impulsive and reckless driving, which might be related to stimulation, but also has been described as a dopaminergic side effect [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reasoned that improved processing of visual, somatosensory and temporal cues on stimulation [8][9][10][11][17][18][19] would lead to a more typical rejection of the RHI when visual-tactile cues are asynchronous. We expected to see this only in the asynchronous condition because, in our previous study, PD had no effect on illusion scores in the synchronous condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%