2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb01e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Supermassive Black Hole Masses of Reverberation-mapped Active Galactic Nuclei

Abstract: Using different kinds of velocity tracers derived from the broad Hβ profile (in the mean or rms spectrum) and the corresponding virial factors f, the central supermassive black hole masses ( ) are calculated for a compiled sample of 120 reverberation-mapped (RM) active galactic nuclei (AGNs). For its subsample of RM AGNs with measured stellar velocity dispersion ( ), the multivariate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Finally, we need an estimate of the virial factor, for which we take ⟨f ⟩ = 0.93 ± 0.09 (see Appendix B), obtained averaging several values from the literature (Mejía-Restrepo et al 2018, Collin et al 2006, Graham et al 2011, Ho & Kim 2014, Woo et al 2015, Williams et al 2018, Wang et al 2019, Yu et al 2020. The resulting average ratio between the observed and predicted gravitational redshift for the X-shooter quasars sample, ⟨z m g z p g ⟩ = 0.87 ± 0.12, at z = 1.55 is shown (light red open circle) in Figure 1 (see also Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. Finally, we need an estimate of the virial factor, for which we take ⟨f ⟩ = 0.93 ± 0.09 (see Appendix B), obtained averaging several values from the literature (Mejía-Restrepo et al 2018, Collin et al 2006, Graham et al 2011, Ho & Kim 2014, Woo et al 2015, Williams et al 2018, Wang et al 2019, Yu et al 2020. The resulting average ratio between the observed and predicted gravitational redshift for the X-shooter quasars sample, ⟨z m g z p g ⟩ = 0.87 ± 0.12, at z = 1.55 is shown (light red open circle) in Figure 1 (see also Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The used value of the virial factor, f , has been calculated as the weighted mean of the estimates given in the following references (see Figure 4): Mejía-Restrepo et al ( 2018), Collin et al (2006), Graham et al (2011), Ho & Kim (2014, Woo et al (2015), Williams et al (2018), Wang et al (2019) and Yu et al (2020). (Notice that we use two values from Collin et al (2006), one of them based in the dependence with the FWHM).…”
Section: B Estimate Of the Average Virial Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate the relation between Fe II features and the accretion process, M BH is a key parameter needing to be determined. With effort over nearly two decades, the reverberation-mapping (RM) method with the Hβ spectral monitoring has been successfully applied for about 120 AGN (e.g., Blandford & McKee 1982;Peterson et al 2004;Du et al 2016a;Grier et al 2017;Yu et al 2020aYu et al , 2020bHu et al 2021). The RM method can measure the time lag between the line variation (e.g., Hβ, Mg II, C IV) and the corresponding continuum variation, and give the broad-line region (BLR) distance from the central SMBH (R BLR ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the RM AGN, ΔV is usually traced by four kinds of velocities, i.e., the broad Hβ FWHM or the line dispersion (σ Hβ ) measured from the mean/rms spectrum (e.g., Peterson et al 2004;Ho & Kim 2014;Yu et al 2020b). From Equation (1), f = M BH /(R BLR (ΔV ) 2 /G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation