2015
DOI: 10.4165/kapps.57.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The suppressive effect of application conditions of <i>Coniothyrium minitans</i> to control <i>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum </i>

Abstract: SummaryVarious treatment conditions were examined to ascertain an effective utilization method of Coniothyrium minitans. Results were confirmed that a sufficient control effect was achieved at a half dose rate of the currently actual dosage. Considering a treatment timing, a better control effect was obtained by spraying at the time of plowing in residues from the prior crop than by treatment before planting. Moreover, a stable efficacy was obtained by increasing the spray volume applied per unit area to avoid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disease protective value for each treatment (125-fold/100 L and 250-fold/200 L) was 61.1 and 92.4, respectively (Table S1). This trend was also observed in the previous year's disease protection test, i.e., disease protective value for each treatment (125-fold/ 100 L and 250-fold/200 L) was 37 and 59, respectively (Iwamoto et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disease protective value for each treatment (125-fold/100 L and 250-fold/200 L) was 61.1 and 92.4, respectively (Table S1). This trend was also observed in the previous year's disease protection test, i.e., disease protective value for each treatment (125-fold/ 100 L and 250-fold/200 L) was 37 and 59, respectively (Iwamoto et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…S2. Disease severity of sclerotinia disease by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in the lettuce in December (Iwamoto et al 2015) was scored according to the following scale: 0, no disease; 1, patchy lesions on the bulb (lesions at the top were discarded because they were due to infection from airborne ascospores); 2, necrosis on a few leaves; or 3, necrosis on the whole plant. Disease protective value was calculated by the following equation: disease protective value = [1 -disease incidence (%) for BCA treatment/disease incidence (%) for control] 9 100.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%