2013
DOI: 10.4236/mr.2013.13006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Surface Skirt in Gaseous Scanning Electron Microscope (GSEM)

Abstract: In this work, a novel parameter called the surface skirt (S s) is introduced. The electron beam scattering by gaseous environment is the fundamental parameter limiting the performance of the Gaseous Scanning Electron Microscopy (GSEM). The result is the enlargement of the primary beam characterized by the radius skirt R s. The scattering phenomena require a much closer re-examination. In fact, depending on the localization of EDX detector and the particles shape to analyze, the collected signal after the beam … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, such simulations affect the improvement of the quality of the image [97] but not the biologically orientated optimization of the physics of the process of interaction of the beam with the tissue, although it is known in biomedicine that the rational configuration of an electron beam provides the optimization of the structural-biological effect [98], while methods for site specific beam focusing have long been used in cry oelectron microscopy [99]. A so called surface skirt, beam broadening during its dispersion in a gas atmo sphere [100], can be a partial solution in the method of electron microscopy of biological specimens, although the decrease in focusing causes the deteriora tion of the quality of the image, and the latter is fraught with a well known effect on the results of semiquanti tative X ray microanalysis in a column [101]. In turn, problems with distinguishing the components of the signal in scanning electron microscopy under the conditions of an atmosphere (a gas) or natural atmo sphere and at "natural" temperature have been known since the 1970s [102], while methods for their GRADOV, GRADOVA distinguishing emerged only in the early 1990s-no sooner than the tools of computer automation made it possible to do so [103].…”
Section: Problems Of Humidity Of Biological Samples and Oxidativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, such simulations affect the improvement of the quality of the image [97] but not the biologically orientated optimization of the physics of the process of interaction of the beam with the tissue, although it is known in biomedicine that the rational configuration of an electron beam provides the optimization of the structural-biological effect [98], while methods for site specific beam focusing have long been used in cry oelectron microscopy [99]. A so called surface skirt, beam broadening during its dispersion in a gas atmo sphere [100], can be a partial solution in the method of electron microscopy of biological specimens, although the decrease in focusing causes the deteriora tion of the quality of the image, and the latter is fraught with a well known effect on the results of semiquanti tative X ray microanalysis in a column [101]. In turn, problems with distinguishing the components of the signal in scanning electron microscopy under the conditions of an atmosphere (a gas) or natural atmo sphere and at "natural" temperature have been known since the 1970s [102], while methods for their GRADOV, GRADOVA distinguishing emerged only in the early 1990s-no sooner than the tools of computer automation made it possible to do so [103].…”
Section: Problems Of Humidity Of Biological Samples and Oxidativementioning
confidence: 99%