“…Generally, such simulations affect the improvement of the quality of the image [97] but not the biologically orientated optimization of the physics of the process of interaction of the beam with the tissue, although it is known in biomedicine that the rational configuration of an electron beam provides the optimization of the structural-biological effect [98], while methods for site specific beam focusing have long been used in cry oelectron microscopy [99]. A so called surface skirt, beam broadening during its dispersion in a gas atmo sphere [100], can be a partial solution in the method of electron microscopy of biological specimens, although the decrease in focusing causes the deteriora tion of the quality of the image, and the latter is fraught with a well known effect on the results of semiquanti tative X ray microanalysis in a column [101]. In turn, problems with distinguishing the components of the signal in scanning electron microscopy under the conditions of an atmosphere (a gas) or natural atmo sphere and at "natural" temperature have been known since the 1970s [102], while methods for their GRADOV, GRADOVA distinguishing emerged only in the early 1990s-no sooner than the tools of computer automation made it possible to do so [103].…”