2005
DOI: 10.1080/03461230510009835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The surplus prior to ruin and the deficit at ruin for a correlated risk process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between the three parts we need to take possible (and necessary) phase changes into account. This reasoning will be similar to [8]. A difference to [13] is that we measure the timesGτ (u) andτ (u) −Gτ (u) in terms of their Laplace transforms.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Between the three parts we need to take possible (and necessary) phase changes into account. This reasoning will be similar to [8]. A difference to [13] is that we measure the timesGτ (u) andτ (u) −Gτ (u) in terms of their Laplace transforms.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint density function of the undershoot and overshoot has been derived in [8] for the fluid flow case from an insurance perspective. We setX t := u − U t , where u is the initial capital and U t is the risk reserve process as given in [8, p. 434].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Bean et al [12], Y (t) represents the amount of wear of a power generator and it may jump from B (indicating that the generator is unusable) to 0 (indicating that it has been replaced by a new equipment). As discussed in Badescu et al [7] and Stanford et al [47], risk processes may be analysed as fluid queues with jumps.…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%