2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02838-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The swan genome and transcriptome, it is not all black and white

Abstract: Background The Australian black swan (Cygnus atratus) is an iconic species with contrasting plumage to that of the closely related northern hemisphere white swans. The relative geographic isolation of the black swan may have resulted in a limited immune repertoire and increased susceptibility to infectious diseases, notably infectious diseases from which Australia has been largely shielded. Unlike mallard ducks and the mute swan (Cygnus olor), the black swan is extremely sensitive to highly p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar pattern is seen in the most closely related species the European starling, and indeed appears to be the most common state of avian proteomes across the species included in our analysis (Fig. 5) and previous similar analysis (Liu et al 2022;Karawita et al 2023) owing to the gene loss that characterises avian genomes (Zhang et al 2014). When considering all gene family changes (not just significant ones) gene family expansion and contraction was more even, a trend not seen in the European starling nor most other avian species (Fig.…”
Section: Gene Family Expansions In Acridotheres Tristissupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar pattern is seen in the most closely related species the European starling, and indeed appears to be the most common state of avian proteomes across the species included in our analysis (Fig. 5) and previous similar analysis (Liu et al 2022;Karawita et al 2023) owing to the gene loss that characterises avian genomes (Zhang et al 2014). When considering all gene family changes (not just significant ones) gene family expansion and contraction was more even, a trend not seen in the European starling nor most other avian species (Fig.…”
Section: Gene Family Expansions In Acridotheres Tristissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…S12). This pattern is seen in other studies of T. guttata (Liu et al 2022;Karawita et al 2023), and is not seen in the zebra finch's nearest relative Lonchura striata domestica despite only 10 million years' divergence (Kumar et al 2022), though this result may also be an artifact of differing annotation approaches.…”
Section: Gene Family Expansions In Acridotheres Tristissupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In general, most avian proteomes across the species included in our analysis ( Fig. 5 ) and previous similar analysis 122 , 123 tend to report more gene family contractions, owing to the gene loss that characterizes avian genomes. 96 The only other avian species included in our analysis that did not conform to this trend was the zebra finch ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…5 ). This pattern is seen in other studies of T. guttata , 122 , 123 and is not seen in the zebra finch’s nearest relative Lonchura striata domestica despite only 10 million years’ divergence, 73 though this result may also be an artifact of differing annotation approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Indeed, at the advent of genome sequencing in birds, chicken chromosomes were arbitrarily grouped as macrochromosomes (1-5), intermediate chromosomes (5-10), and microchromosomes (11+) (Hillier et al 2004). Subsequent studies have either used these criteria, grouping macrochromosomes and intermediate chromosomes as macrochromosomes, ranging in size from ~23Mb to ~200Mb (O’Connor et al 2018), or established their own criteria for an arbitrary cutoff, such as 10Mb, 30Mb, or 50Mb (Karawita et al 2022; Perry et al 2021; Srikulnath et al 2021; Waters et al 2021). However, these arbitrary categorizations—enforced across vertebrates—make direct comparisons between taxa difficult and may encourage spurious correlations from these artifacts.…”
Section: (3b) Microchromosome Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%