The Sweet Enchantment of Color-Blind Racism in Obamerica

Abstract

It has become accepted dogma among whites in the United States that race is no longer a central factor determining the life chances of Americans. In this article, the authors counter this myth by describing how the ideology of color-blind racism works to defend and justify the contemporary racial order. The authors illustrate three basic frames of this ideology, namely, abstract liberalism, cultural racism, and minimization of racism. The authors then examine research that has empirically shown the effects of color-blind racism on whites' reactions to Hurricane Katrina, among whites who have adopted children of color, and in America's elite law schools. Finally, the authors examine how the election of Barack Obama is not an example of America becoming a "post-racial" country but reflects color-blind racism. The authors argue that the Obama phenomenon as a cultural symbol and his political stance and persona on race are compatible with color-blind racism. The authors conclude with the prognosis that, under the Obama administration, the tentacles of color-blind racism will reach even deeper into the crevices of the American polity. is a PhD candidate in sociology at Duke University. His areas of interest are racial and ethnic relations, social movements, immigration, social stratification, sociological theory, and sociology of law. His recent research includes examinations of racism in the popular debate over illegal immigration, race in online virtual worlds, and an examination of anti-affirmative action protests on college campuses. His dissertation is titled "Rebellious Conservatives: A Study of Conservative Social Movements."

Character analysis and racism in marketing theory and practice

“…Underscoring the somewhat fluid nature of racism and its disavowal, his writing with various co-authors details the ways that racial beliefs continue to be manifested and negotiated (e.g. Bonilla-Silva, 2002;Bonilla-Silva and Dietrich, 2011;Bonilla-Silva and Forman, 2000;Bonilla-Silva et al, 2006; see also Weaver, 2011). 10.…”

“…Alternatively they may modify their discourse to appear non-racist (cf. Bonilla-Silva, 2002), often justifying the existing racialized status quo in their linguistic somersaults (Bonilla-Silva and Dietrich, 2011).…”

Concept Expansion as a Source of Empowerment

“…As Haslam notes, however, overt bigotry has in recent decades been replaced with more subtle (but no less insidious) forms of prejudice and discrimination (Bonilla-Silva & Dietrich, 2011). Potential targets now have to contend not only with the effects of being discriminated against but also the ambiguity of whether a gesture or policy is intentionally biased against them.…”

Making sense of race/ethnicity and gender in televised football: reception research among British students

“…This particular account might be indicative of what has been termed 'colour-blind racism' (Bonilla-Silva and Dietrich 2011), an ideology that sees racism and racial stereotyping as something of the past and no longer an issue even though a great variety of studies proof otherwise. Colour-blind racism operates through the denial of the structural character of racism and thereby leaves unequal power relations, white normativity and the invisibility of whiteness unmarked and unspoken (Bonilla-Silva and Dietrich 2011;Hylton 2009). Colour-blind racism was also evident in the statements by respondents who claimed on the one hand that race or ethnicity has nothing to do with how players play while associating, on the other hand, black players with natural physicality and white players with mentality.…”