2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0025100311000107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The symbolization of central approximants in the IPA

Abstract: Approximants that can be considered weaker versions of voiced fricatives (termed here 'frictionless continuants') are poorly served by the IPA in terms of symbolization as compared to semi-vowel approximants. In this paper we survey the central approximants and the symbols and diacritics used to transcribe them; we focus on evidence for the use of non-rhotic frictionless continuants in both natural language (by which we mean non-clinical varieties) and disordered speech; and we suggest some possible unitary sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These problems were addressed in Ball & Rahilly (2011), and a potential set of symbols was put forward. This set, modified to use reversed or turned symbols throughout, is also included in Ball, Rahilly & Lowry (2017).…”
Section: Transcribing the Approximant Versions Of Voiced Fricativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems were addressed in Ball & Rahilly (2011), and a potential set of symbols was put forward. This set, modified to use reversed or turned symbols throughout, is also included in Ball, Rahilly & Lowry (2017).…”
Section: Transcribing the Approximant Versions Of Voiced Fricativesmentioning
confidence: 99%