1977
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.1.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift revisited: A review of research and theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
155
0
23

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
155
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, although children across all age groups produced more paradigmatic than syntagmatic associates, 11-year-olds made very few syntagmatic responses. This change in type of associative response with age demonstrates a reorganization of existing knowledge (Nelson, 1977).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, although children across all age groups produced more paradigmatic than syntagmatic associates, 11-year-olds made very few syntagmatic responses. This change in type of associative response with age demonstrates a reorganization of existing knowledge (Nelson, 1977).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were interested in what type of responses children across different ages would make (i.e., meaningful word associates versus non-meaningful responses). In addition, we explored whether there was a syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift in children's responses (see Nelson, 1977, for an overview). Syntagmatic refers to words from different grammatical classes that appear together in discourse (e.g., dog -bark) whereas paradigmatic refers to words from the same grammatical class (e.g., dog -cat).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests that some conceptually-related aspects (i.e., functional components) of words -at least as defined in this study -appear to be better developed in preschool children who stutter than conceptual as well as perceptual aspects of words (cf. Nelson, 1977). At this point in development, CWS appear to be organizing lexical information functionally more so than physically.…”
Section: Cws Are Faster In Response To a Functional Prime Than A Physmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A number of important and infl uential studies in the 1960s and 1970s used word association behavior to draw inferences about the developmental organization of the fi rst-language (L1) lexicon (e.g., Entwisle, 1966 ;Ervin, 1961 ;Lippman, 1971 ;McNeill, 1966 ;Nelson, 1977 ). A body of work subsequently emerged that used similar techniques in the exploration of the bilingual lexicon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%