2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The syntectonic evolution of foredeep turbidites related to basin segmentation: Facies response to the increase in tectonic confinement (Marnoso-arenacea Formation, Miocene, Northern Apennines, Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
75
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the grain size breaks and sub‐type 1c beds are evidence of the bypass of the upper turbulent portion of bipartite flows (Mutti et al ., ; Tinterri & Muzzi Magalhaes, ; Stevenson et al ., ), which can transport the finer grain sizes further downcurrent and rework the top of F5 facies into tractive structures, such as megaripples (F6) and even and parallel traction carpets (F7). This facies association, generally featuring high sandstone–mudstone ratios, is very similar to that described by Tinterri & Tagliaferri () in confined foredeeps, where the processes of flow decoupling and bypassing turbulent flows appear to be favoured by decelerations induced by morphological confinement. In particular, high degrees of deceleration could also cause the formation of mud‐draped scours ( sensu Mutti & Normark, , ) linked to hydraulic jumps (see Fig.…”
Section: Facies Analysis and Bed Typessupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the grain size breaks and sub‐type 1c beds are evidence of the bypass of the upper turbulent portion of bipartite flows (Mutti et al ., ; Tinterri & Muzzi Magalhaes, ; Stevenson et al ., ), which can transport the finer grain sizes further downcurrent and rework the top of F5 facies into tractive structures, such as megaripples (F6) and even and parallel traction carpets (F7). This facies association, generally featuring high sandstone–mudstone ratios, is very similar to that described by Tinterri & Tagliaferri () in confined foredeeps, where the processes of flow decoupling and bypassing turbulent flows appear to be favoured by decelerations induced by morphological confinement. In particular, high degrees of deceleration could also cause the formation of mud‐draped scours ( sensu Mutti & Normark, , ) linked to hydraulic jumps (see Fig.…”
Section: Facies Analysis and Bed Typessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…). These six bed types are fully consistent with those introduced by Tinterri & Tagliaferri () in the Marnoso‐arenacea Formation, except for some differences due to different basin morphologies and proximity degree between these two turbidite systems. A description and interpretation of the six bed types, key beds and slumps recognized in the studied stratigraphic succession is given below.…”
Section: Facies Analysis and Bed Typessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). The Northern Apennines are mainly composed of Cretaceous tectonically deformed clays (the Ligurian units; Codegone et al ., ; Carlini et al ., ) and Tertiary turbidites (Marnoso‐Arenacea formation; Ricci Lucchi, ; Tinterri & Tagliaferri, ). The Po River drains an area of about 75 000 km 2 and flows in a west–east direction for 652 km (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…laminar fluxes and diluted conditions observed in the turbulent flows (Tinterri & Tagliaferri, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%