Extended Linear Chain Compounds 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4175-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Synthesis and Static Magnetic Properties of First-Row Transition-Metal Compounds with Chain Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 292 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a small decrease in moment from 10 to 4.2 K and while this can be fit to theory (Wagner and Friedberg model, g = 2.00 and J = -0.02 cm-' (Fig. 4)), the fit should not be interpreted as definite evidence for exchange in this material; such small decreases in moment at low temperatures could be accounted for by zero-field splitting effects (38). Nonetheless, the fit does place an upper limit of -0.02 cm-' on J and shows that any net exchange in the hydrate must be very weak indeed compared to that present in the anhydrous compound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a small decrease in moment from 10 to 4.2 K and while this can be fit to theory (Wagner and Friedberg model, g = 2.00 and J = -0.02 cm-' (Fig. 4)), the fit should not be interpreted as definite evidence for exchange in this material; such small decreases in moment at low temperatures could be accounted for by zero-field splitting effects (38). Nonetheless, the fit does place an upper limit of -0.02 cm-' on J and shows that any net exchange in the hydrate must be very weak indeed compared to that present in the anhydrous compound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A small amount of paramagnetic impurity will affect the shape of the susceptibility versus temperature curve especially for antiferromagnets at lower temperatures. Both models ignore zerofield splitting effects (38) and although these should be small in the case of Mn(I1) they may have a significant effect at low temperatures. Also, interchain interactions are ignored in both models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly the strongest antiferromagnetic exchange observed previously is in the a-forms of copper(I1) n-decyl-and n-dodecylphosphinate where I J I values of 29 cm-' have been reported (3). The neutral pyrazine (1,4-diazine, C4H4N2) ligand is also known to bridge copper centres and form linear chain polymers (15)(16)(17). An examination of the exchange coupling constants reported for Can.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…4. The magnitude of J is small and, particularly since zero field splitting effects can account for minor decreases in moment at low temperatures (14), not too much quantitative significance should be attached to it. Clearly though, the results place an upper limit of 0.017 cm-I on the magnitude of the exchange coupling constant in 1 and show that antiferromagnetic exchange in the compound, if it exists at all, is very weak.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%