2000
DOI: 10.1039/a9rp90006c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Teaching of Chemistry: Who Is the Learner?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative humidity values of 100% or higher imply no evaporation Humidity of the surrounding air influences evaporation *Students' alternative conceptions (SAC) and difficulties about evaporation were derived from the following studies: Bar, 1989;Bar and Travis, 1991;Beveridge, 1985;Canpolat, 2006;Chang, 1999;Coştu, 2006;Coştu and Ayas, 2005;Driver et al, 1994;Fredrickson et al, 2006;Garnett et al, 1995;Goodwin, 2000;Gopal et al, 2004;Hatziniktia & Koulaidis, 1997;Henriques, 2000;Johnson, 1998Johnson, , 2005Kruger & Summers, 1989;Lee et al, 1993;Mulford and Robinson, 2002;Novak and Musonda, 1991;Osborne and Cosgrove, 1983;Paik et al 2004;Papageorgiou and Johnson, 2005;Prain et al, 2009;Russell et al, 1989;Tytler, 2000;Tytler and Peterson, 2001, 2005Tytler et al, 2007;Valanides, 2000;Varelas et al, 2006;You and Schallert, 1992. argument, and ideally, be able to explain that concept to other classmates. (c) The new conception must be plausible for it to be accommodated.…”
Section: Evaporation and Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative humidity values of 100% or higher imply no evaporation Humidity of the surrounding air influences evaporation *Students' alternative conceptions (SAC) and difficulties about evaporation were derived from the following studies: Bar, 1989;Bar and Travis, 1991;Beveridge, 1985;Canpolat, 2006;Chang, 1999;Coştu, 2006;Coştu and Ayas, 2005;Driver et al, 1994;Fredrickson et al, 2006;Garnett et al, 1995;Goodwin, 2000;Gopal et al, 2004;Hatziniktia & Koulaidis, 1997;Henriques, 2000;Johnson, 1998Johnson, , 2005Kruger & Summers, 1989;Lee et al, 1993;Mulford and Robinson, 2002;Novak and Musonda, 1991;Osborne and Cosgrove, 1983;Paik et al 2004;Papageorgiou and Johnson, 2005;Prain et al, 2009;Russell et al, 1989;Tytler, 2000;Tytler and Peterson, 2001, 2005Tytler et al, 2007;Valanides, 2000;Varelas et al, 2006;You and Schallert, 1992. argument, and ideally, be able to explain that concept to other classmates. (c) The new conception must be plausible for it to be accommodated.…”
Section: Evaporation and Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless, there still seems to be widespread failure in translating and disseminating such outcomes about students' alternative conceptions into practice, which is also the case in many other fields of science education (Costa, Marquez & Kempa, 2000;de Jong, 2000). Moreover, research has also indicated that teachers and teacher trainees themselves often exhibit alternative conceptions in their thoughts and actions, which are similar (or even identical) to their students' conceptions (Goodwin, 2000;de Jong, 2000b;Valanides, 2000aValanides, , 2000b. It has also been frequently observed that even curriculum developers and textbook authors do not always take sufficient care to carefully incorporate important research evidence when preparing teaching and learning materials (Eilks, 2003;Eilks, Möllering, & Valanides, 2009).…”
Section: The Potentially Misleading Character Of Visualisations Of the Sub-microscopic Domain From Textbooks And The Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature review (Banerjee, 1991;Tulberg et al, 1994;;Quílez-Pardo and Solaz-Portolés, 1995;Haidar, 1997;Lee, 1999;Goodwin, 2000;de Jong et al, 2002;Davis et al, 2006;Abell, 2007;Cheung, 2009aCheung, , 2009bCheung et al, 2009;Lin et al, 2000), it is evident that preservice and in-service chemistry teachers worldwide may not be receiving adequate training as beginning teachers. For example, in Yemen, Haidar (1997) assessed 173 preservice chemistry teachers' understandings of the concept of relative atomic mass using two open-ended questions: (1) What do we mean when we say that the atomic mass of iron is 55.85?…”
Section: Subject Matter Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%