2015
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121214991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Technical Efficiency of Earthquake Medical Rapid Response Teams Following Disasters: The Case of the 2010 Yushu Earthquake in China

Abstract: Purpose: Performance assessments of earthquake medical rapid response teams (EMRRTs), particularly the first responders deployed to the hardest hit areas following major earthquakes, should consider efficient and effective use of resources. This study assesses the daily technical efficiency of EMRRTs in the emergency period immediately following the 2010 Yushu earthquake in China. Methods: Data on EMRRTs were obtained from official daily reports of the general headquarters for Yushu earthquake relief, the emer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following an earthquake, rapid planning of the primary treatment for patients admitted to the hospital from emergency departments within the first five days is of utmost importance in terms of reducing mortality and morbidity. [ 15 , 16 ] In this respect, 2,981 earthquake survivors received healthcare services at our center within the first five days after the earthquake. A total of 76% of these patients (n=2,264) were young adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following an earthquake, rapid planning of the primary treatment for patients admitted to the hospital from emergency departments within the first five days is of utmost importance in terms of reducing mortality and morbidity. [ 15 , 16 ] In this respect, 2,981 earthquake survivors received healthcare services at our center within the first five days after the earthquake. A total of 76% of these patients (n=2,264) were young adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%