Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to compare two different needle-free connectors to show that when used correctly the needle-free connectors port does not cause pathogenic surface colonization. The secondary objective is to determine whether there is a difference in catheter or blood stream infection between two kind of needle-free connectors. Method: Aged 18-99, 199 patients, who were inserted central venous catheters follwed-up in intensive care unit were included to the study. The patients were divided into two groups as Group A (n: 99) and Group B (n: 100) according to the needle-free connector type used. During this study manipulation number of devices will be reported. Two blood culture samples, one from the central venous catheter and the other from the peripheral vein, were taken from the patient before removing the catheters. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between age, day of ICU stay, fever, number of medications, number of connector changes and length of longest connector stay. In Group A, 7 patients and In Group B, 23 patients had colonization in catheter culture and it was statistically significant. Colonization was detected 14 patients in Group A, and 28 patients in GroupB in blood culture, and it was statistically significant. Conclusion: Hub contamination can lead to sepsis, which can lead to life-threatening consequences and suitable hub selection has an effect on sepsis control. Suitable needle-free connector selection has an effect on sepsis control. We thought that, Group A free connector is better at avoiding sepsis then other connector when standard disinfection technique is used.