2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014jd021597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temporal and spatial variability in submeter scale surface roughness of seasonal snow in Sodankylä Finnish Lapland in 2009–2010

Abstract: Seasonal snow surface roughness is an important parameter for remote sensing data analysis since it affects the scattering properties of the snow surface. To understand the phenomenon, snow surface roughness was measured near the town of Sodankylä, in Finnish Lapland, during winters 2009 and 2010 using a photogrammetry-based plate method. The images were automatically processed so that an approximately 1 m long horizontal profile was extracted from each image. The data set consists of 669 plate profiles from d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(135 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roughness increased during snowmelt as compared to immediately after snowfall, as previously observed (Anttila et al, 2014;Fassnacht et al, 2009). The cavities developed during the melting trap a fraction of the reflected light into their walls, particularly at the shortest wavelengths due to multiple reflections between the walls.…”
Section: Model Discrepanciessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Roughness increased during snowmelt as compared to immediately after snowfall, as previously observed (Anttila et al, 2014;Fassnacht et al, 2009). The cavities developed during the melting trap a fraction of the reflected light into their walls, particularly at the shortest wavelengths due to multiple reflections between the walls.…”
Section: Model Discrepanciessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This implies that surface roughness of amplitude 10 cm (such as sastrugi) reduces the visible albedo, but much smaller irregularities can affect the near-infrared albedo. Nevertheless, only few measurements of millimetre-scale snow surface roughness have been carried out so far (Anttila et al, 2014;Frassnacht et al, 2009;Manninen, 1997), and they have not yet been applied to interpret the surface albedo.…”
Section: Model Discrepanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cameras mounted on manned or unmanned aerial vehicles allow the mapping of HS [ 120 , 121 , 122 ] and snow BRDF [ 123 ], the latter requiring calibrated white targets at the surface as a reference. Snow surface roughness is obtained from the processing of photos with reference scales, such as a graduated blackboard vertically inserted into the snow surface [ 124 ] and graduated survey strings aligned over the glacier surface [ 125 ]. Macro-photography is applied to measure snow grain shape and size metrics (as the optical equivalent snow grain size) of snow particles extracted from the snow pit wall (e.g., [ 30 , 31 ]) and of drifting snow particles attached to sticking slides (e.g., [ 126 ]).…”
Section: Table A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citation: Anttila, K., T. Manninen, T. Karjalainen, P. Lahtinen, A. Riihelä, and N. Siljamo (2014), The temporal and spatial variability in submeter scale surface roughness of seasonal snow in Sodankylä Finnish Lapland in 2009-2010, J. Geophys. Res.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of snow is also significantly affected by the roughness of the snow surface [Peltoniemi et al, 2010b;Warren et al, 1998]. In radiative models the albedo of a snow layer is reduced when surface roughness is taken into account [Zhuravleva and Kokhanovsky, 2011]. Understanding how roughness affects the signal received by satellite instruments and knowing the connections between surface roughness and the geophysical properties of the snow pack (for example crystal size and shape, density, specific surface area, and state of crystal metamorphosis) could support the use of surface roughness information in interpreting the state of snow cover from remote sensing data, e.g., the level of melting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%