2016
DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/krw021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘The Territorial Jurisdiction of the ICC for Core Crimes Committed Through the Internet’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as Vagias ( 2016) observes, a cyber-attack could be a form of public and direct incitement to commit genocide, as prohibited by the Convention for the prevention and suppression of the Crime of Genocide. While the incitement was qualified as an act of genocide both in the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and in that of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, this is no longer the case in the Rome Statute (2002), where the incitement to commit genocide is instead a mode of responsibility (Vagias, 2016). According to Article 25 of the Rome Statute (2002), anyone who contributes to the commission of a crime can also be held responsible, either by instigation or by complicity.…”
Section: Cyber-attacks In the Context Of International Criminal Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as Vagias ( 2016) observes, a cyber-attack could be a form of public and direct incitement to commit genocide, as prohibited by the Convention for the prevention and suppression of the Crime of Genocide. While the incitement was qualified as an act of genocide both in the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and in that of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, this is no longer the case in the Rome Statute (2002), where the incitement to commit genocide is instead a mode of responsibility (Vagias, 2016). According to Article 25 of the Rome Statute (2002), anyone who contributes to the commission of a crime can also be held responsible, either by instigation or by complicity.…”
Section: Cyber-attacks In the Context Of International Criminal Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…85 Case law from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), whose statutes included similar provisions, reveals that "direct" means an actual invitation, whether explicit or implicit, to commit genocidal acts. 86 It is therefore again dubious that disinformation alone would ever be prosecuted as incitement to genocide.…”
Section: Incitementmentioning
confidence: 99%