The Therapeutic Efficacy of Domestic Violence Victim Interventions

Abstract

A meta-analysis on domestic violence interventions was conducted to determine overall effectiveness of mental health programs involving women and children in joint treatment. These interventions were further analyzed to determine whether outcomes are differentially affected based on the outcome measure employed. To date, no meta-analyses have been published on domestic violence victim intervention efficacy. The 17 investigations that met study criteria yielded findings indicating that domestic violence interventions have a large effect size (d = .812), which decreases to a medium effect size when compared to control groups (d = .518). Effect sizes were assessed to determine whether treatment differed according to the focus of the outcome measure employed: (a) external stress (behavioral problems, aggression, or alcohol use); (b) psychological adjustment (depression, anxiety, or happiness); (c) self-concept (self-esteem, perceived competence, or internal locus of control); (d) social adjustment (popularity, loneliness, or cooperativeness); (e) family relations (mother-child relations, affection, or quality of interaction); and (f) maltreatment events (reoccurrence of violence, return to partner). Results reveal that domestic violence interventions across all outcome categories yield effects in the medium to large range for both internalized and externalized symptomatology. Implications for greater awareness and support for domestic violence treatment and programming are discussed.

The promotion of well‐being among children exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review of interventions

“…Studies rated as having a high risk of bias (or "critical bias" as described by Sterne et al, 2014) were excluded. Our decision to examine only studies assessed to be at low or moderate risk of bias was conservative, built from the concerns expressed by authors of prior reviews (e.g., Hackett et al, 2016;Howarth et al, 2016;Rizo et al, 2011) that conclusions around "what works" have been drawn from a literature dominated by studies that are not methodologically rigorous. • RCTs in which individuals or parent-child pairs are randomly assigned to intervention and comparison conditions;…”

Annual Research Review: Umbrella synthesis of meta‐analyses on child maltreatment antecedents and interventions: differential susceptibility perspective on risk and resilience

“…Eleven meta‐analyses on interventions targeting substantiated child maltreatment cases were identified (see Table ). Combined effect sizes for interventions focusing on reported maltreatment ranged from d = −.05 (Viswanathan et al, ) to d = .55 (Hackett et al, ), with an estimated umbrella effect size of d = .27 (see Figure ). The best meta‐analytic evidence for interventions focusing on child maltreatment reported to child protective services may be derived from Viswanathan et al () who included ten RCT studies in their estimate of the effectiveness of interventions to decrease maltreatment (see Table ).…”

Counseling Intimate Partner Abuse Survivors: Effective and Ineffective Interventions

“…This belief was associated with rating the therapy as helpful (Leedom et al, 2017). In addition to supervision from experienced clinicians, local domestic violence agencies and programs may be a resource for counselors (Hackett, McWhirter, & Lesher, 2016).…”