2010
DOI: 10.4324/9780203856338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Think-Aloud Controversy in Second Language Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
192
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
7
192
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…His study tried to determine whether translation would facilitate the process of L2 reading comprehension. For this purpose, Kern asked Fifty-one intermediate-level French students to participate in think-aloud interviews while reading texts in the L2 French (see Bowles (2010) on think-aloud interviews and protocols in L2 research). The aim was to see whether mental translation that L2 readers engage in would improve their comprehension of L2 texts.…”
Section: Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His study tried to determine whether translation would facilitate the process of L2 reading comprehension. For this purpose, Kern asked Fifty-one intermediate-level French students to participate in think-aloud interviews while reading texts in the L2 French (see Bowles (2010) on think-aloud interviews and protocols in L2 research). The aim was to see whether mental translation that L2 readers engage in would improve their comprehension of L2 texts.…”
Section: Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain perspectives, comprehension shows directions and set expectation values for reception. The diversity differentia of different learners belonging to different levels could be exhibited [3] . Moreover, it enables the metrical explore the relationship among language, pragmatics and cognitive process in listening and speaking, and students' understanding, using and cognation treatment on language are explained and shown by research process.…”
Section: A Operation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ellis 2005R. Ellis , 2009b; R. Ellis & Lowen 2007;Norris & Ortega, 2000), and (3) reactivity in the online thinkaloud protocol (Bowles, 2008(Bowles, , 2010a(Bowles, , 2010b Table 1). Ellis (2009a) notes that implicitness of instruction does not guarantee that learners engage in implicit learning processes because they "may follow their own inclinations" (p. 6).…”
Section: Methodological Issues Of Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%