2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06591-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Third Delay in General Surgical Care in a Regional Referral Hospital in Soroti, Uganda

Abstract: Background Building capacity for surgical care in low-and-middle-income countries is essential for the improvement of global health and economic growth. This study assesses in-hospital delays of surgical services at Soroti Regional Referral Hospital (SRRH), a tertiary healthcare facility in Soroti, Uganda. Methods A prospective general surgical database at SRRH was analyzed. Data on patient demographics, surgical characteristics, delays of care, and advers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, we report a surgical cancellation rate of 16.96%. This number is slightly lower than the cited rates reported in the literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Although our number of cases is similar to other published reports (146 cases [1], 369 cases [7], 243 cases [8]), this lower rate may be a reflection associated with a specific single surgical oncological service analysis, the fact that we had no documented causes of cancellations related to social determinants such as lack of electricity and fewer cases being cancelled related to lack/absence of professional personnel (surgeon or anaesthesiologist), given that this centre is the only major referral centre for gynaecologic oncology in the entire country [1,7,8] The most common identified reason for surgical cancellations was having a low haemoglobin and/or the lack of blood products (40.90%) being available on the date of scheduled surgery.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our series, we report a surgical cancellation rate of 16.96%. This number is slightly lower than the cited rates reported in the literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Although our number of cases is similar to other published reports (146 cases [1], 369 cases [7], 243 cases [8]), this lower rate may be a reflection associated with a specific single surgical oncological service analysis, the fact that we had no documented causes of cancellations related to social determinants such as lack of electricity and fewer cases being cancelled related to lack/absence of professional personnel (surgeon or anaesthesiologist), given that this centre is the only major referral centre for gynaecologic oncology in the entire country [1,7,8] The most common identified reason for surgical cancellations was having a low haemoglobin and/or the lack of blood products (40.90%) being available on the date of scheduled surgery.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Across surgical service lines in LMIC operative cancellations of scheduled surgical cases range from 18% to 31% [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Most common causes of reported cancellations were surgeons or anaesthesiologist unavailability; lack of operating theatre time, equipment, ancillary surgical personnel and electricity; and improper surgical scheduling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reliance on self-recall imparts possible reporting-bias, although the extent of recall-bias has not been assessed in Uganda. Surgical complications were captured from surgical notes, so incomplete surgical notes and limited medical charting may have led to inaccurate record of surgical complications, a similar finding to that of the SRRH trauma surgery registry [ 18 ]. Precise time of arrival, time to decision, and time to surgery were not recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providers then reported which factors caused the delay, which was recorded in our registry. Causes of delays were organized into broad categories to represent deficits in personnel, equipment, and infrastructure [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%