2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Three-Dimensional Stable Roommates Problem with Additively Separable Preferences

Abstract: The Stable Roommates problem involves matching a set of agents into pairs based on the agents' strict ordinal preference lists. The matching must be stable, meaning that no two agents strictly prefer each other to their assigned partners. A number of three-dimensional variants exist, in which agents are instead matched into triples. Both the original problem and these variants can also be viewed as hedonic games. We formalise a three-dimensional variant using general additively separable preferences, in which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, even with symmetric additive preferences, a solution in the core may not exist (Arkin et al 2009), and checking whether it does is NP-hard (Chen and Roy 2021). However, if we further restrict the preferences to be binary, then McKay and Manlove (2021) show that a solution in the core always exists and can be found efficiently. Our problem can be seen as a multidimensional generalization of the roommate problem with symmetric binary additive preferences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, even with symmetric additive preferences, a solution in the core may not exist (Arkin et al 2009), and checking whether it does is NP-hard (Chen and Roy 2021). However, if we further restrict the preferences to be binary, then McKay and Manlove (2021) show that a solution in the core always exists and can be found efficiently. Our problem can be seen as a multidimensional generalization of the roommate problem with symmetric binary additive preferences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%