1987
DOI: 10.1177/001872088702900106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Threshold for Hypoxia Effects on Perceptual- Motor Performance

Abstract: The hypoxia threshold for a decrement in perceptual-motor performance was determined with six subjects using a serial choice response time task at two levels of stimulus brightness. Low-oxygen mixtures were used to reduce SaO] (arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation) to hypoxic levels ranging from 86% to 76% in steps of2%. These values correspond to altitudes ranging from 8900 ft to 11 400 feet. Response time was slowed in a dose-dependent manner with a significant effect becoming apparent at an SaO] of 82% (10 000… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired air is approximately 0.03% (350 ppm) CO 2 while in the expired air is 4-6%, the most when exercising. While considerable research has been conducted on the effects of hypoxia [3] and carbon monoxide [4,5] few attempts have been made to determine the maximum tolerable level of CO 2 that does not adversely affect both physical and mental performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired air is approximately 0.03% (350 ppm) CO 2 while in the expired air is 4-6%, the most when exercising. While considerable research has been conducted on the effects of hypoxia [3] and carbon monoxide [4,5] few attempts have been made to determine the maximum tolerable level of CO 2 that does not adversely affect both physical and mental performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although performance decrements in either reaction time, psychomotor skills or mental efficiency have been detected at altitudes as low as 2,100-3,000 m [8,14,25,28], there is no clear evidence that such relatively low altitudes have any effect on the performance of well-learned tasks [11,30]; the most clear-cut effect induced by altitudes of up to 3,000 m being an increased learning time [9]. At higher altitudes (4,300-6,100 m), decrements in reaction time [27], psychomotor ability [5,21,22,32,34] and mental efficiency [5,10,16,21,22,32] are clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the minimum altitude that causes changes on perceptual motor performance, in 1987 Fowler and colleagues 126 established altitude-response curves for the serial choice reaction time task for two levels of stimulus brightness. Pao 2 was manipulated in small increments by having six subjects breathe low-oxygen gas mixtures so that varied levels of hypoxemia (simulating altitudes of 2,712-3,475 m) were produced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%