The Throw-and-Catch Model of Human Gait: Evidence from Coupling of Pre-Step Postural Activity and Step Location

Abstract

Postural activity normally precedes the lift of a foot from the ground when taking a step, but its function is unclear. The throw-and-catch hypothesis of human gait proposes that the pre-step activity is organized to generate momentum for the body to fall ballistically along a specific trajectory during the step. The trajectory is appropriate for the stepping foot to land at its intended location while at the same time being optimally placed to catch the body and regain balance. The hypothesis therefore predicts a strong coupling between the pre-step activity and step location. Here we examine this coupling when stepping to visually-presented targets at different locations. Ten healthy, young subjects were instructed to step as accurately as possible onto targets placed in five locations that required either different step directions or different step lengths. In 75% of trials, the target location remained constant throughout the step. In the remaining 25% of trials, the intended step location was changed by making the target jump to a new location 96 ms ± 43 ms after initiation of the pre-step activity, long before foot lift. As predicted by the throw-and-catch hypothesis, when the target location remained constant, the pre-step activity led to body momentum at foot lift that was coupled to the intended step location. When the target location jumped, the pre-step activity was adjusted (median latency 223 ms) and prolonged (on average by 69 ms), which altered the body’s momentum at foot lift according to where the target had moved. We conclude that whenever possible the coupling between the pre-step activity and the step location is maintained. This provides further support for the throw-and-catch hypothesis of human gait.

How accuracy of foot-placement is affected by the size of the base of support and crutch support in stroke survivors and healthy adults

“…Our study showed smaller reduction in foot-placement error due to support (about through anticipation of CoM trajectory in subsequent steps [24,25]. Differences in the size of effect of crutch support on foot-placement error between target stepping paradigms during walking and a singular step, suggest that balance differentially affects foot-placement control across these two contexts [4,25].…”

Walking with perturbations: a guide for biped humans and robots

“…During gait, a brief period of cocontraction/freeze may be functional as it minimally affects the ongoing gait process. This is seen during perturbed gait initiation [339] or when auditory startle responses were elicited during gait [126]. Other different kinds of perturbation can elicit similar brief coactivations of ankle flexors and extensors.…”

Walking Along Curved Trajectories. Changes With Age and Parkinson's Disease. Hints to Rehabilitation

“…Any minor change in the adjustment of the asymmetric step length of the two legs produces dramatic effects in the kinematics, very much as it occurs with minimal changes in the localization of ground reaction forces underneath the feet during the stance phases (6). Therefore, accurate brain control is required for correct rotation of the lower limbs and inversion or eversion of the ankle for successful placement of the foot on the ground (4, 24–31).…”