2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12567-016-0139-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The TICTOP nozzle: a new nozzle contouring concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand what actually happens in TOC nozzles, several experimental studies, carried out on optimized nozzles with subscale (Nave and Coffey (1973), Nguyen et al (2003), Hadjadj et al (2015) and Ijaz Rajesh ( 2019)) or full-scale (Nave and Coffey (1973)), confirmed by various numerical simulations (Frey and Hagemann (1998), Aghababaie and Theunissen (2015), Maicke et al (2013)) and experiments (Frey et al (2017), Meng and Ye (2017), Changsoo et al (2020), Martelli et al (2020), Ruyan et al (2016)), and Stark Genin (2016), have an FSS separation kind, the flow boundary layer separated from the nozzle wall and is not reattached (see Fig. 3a), while a restricted shock separation is marked by closed recirculation bubbles that are re-attached to the wall nozzle behind the point of separation (see Fig.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To understand what actually happens in TOC nozzles, several experimental studies, carried out on optimized nozzles with subscale (Nave and Coffey (1973), Nguyen et al (2003), Hadjadj et al (2015) and Ijaz Rajesh ( 2019)) or full-scale (Nave and Coffey (1973)), confirmed by various numerical simulations (Frey and Hagemann (1998), Aghababaie and Theunissen (2015), Maicke et al (2013)) and experiments (Frey et al (2017), Meng and Ye (2017), Changsoo et al (2020), Martelli et al (2020), Ruyan et al (2016)), and Stark Genin (2016), have an FSS separation kind, the flow boundary layer separated from the nozzle wall and is not reattached (see Fig. 3a), while a restricted shock separation is marked by closed recirculation bubbles that are re-attached to the wall nozzle behind the point of separation (see Fig.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nasuti and Onofri (1996) demonstrated by numerical simulations the effect of the vortex in deflecting the central flow towards the walls. An analytical model for the cap shock structure associated with the RSS phase and for FSS-RSS transition prediction was provided by Frey et al (2017). Reverse flow in TOC nozzle plume has latterly been experimentally demonstrated (Wang et al (2013), Stark and Génin (2016), Steger and Warming (1979)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: K -factor [dm 3 /(min·bar 0,5 )] Q -flow nozzle [dm 3 /min] p -nozzle supply pressure [bar] Three types of nozzles were tested: spiral nozzle TF 6, impact nozzle P 54, swirl axis nozzle with tangent inlet holes in the disc CW-50 F (Fig.2). In the TF 6 nozzle, water flows down the spiral part under pressure and is centrifugally thrown away [50][51][52][53]. In the P 54 jet nozzle water is disrupted by a deflector.…”
Section: (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To expand a flow to match near vacuum conditions, one would need a near infinite nozzle [6]. The length of an ideal nozzle can be decreased by permitting all the expansion to occur just at the throat (amid a sharp corner) and then constructing the nozzle contour to turn the flow such that it can attain an axial uniform flow at the exit [7]. This nozzle is referred to as a minimum-length nozzle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%