2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The time geography of segregation during working hours

Abstract: While segregation is usually evaluated at the residential level, the recent influx of large streams of data describing urbanites’ movement across the city allows to generate detailed descriptions of spatio-temporal segregation patterns across the activity space of individuals. For instance, segregation across the activity space is usually thought to be lower compared with residential segregation given the importance of social complementarity, among other factors, shaping the economies of cities. However, these… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the urban sensing literature, mobile phone data play a prominent role as they form a source of passively collected information (users do not need to make an explicit action to share their locations as would be the case in, for example, location-based services or social networks), for large shares of populations (a large proportion of the world population now owns a mobile device of any sort), captured at a rather high spatial resolution (in general, the density of cell towers is high in urban areas). Mobile phone data research in an urban context has been applied to a diversity of individual cities, or to international comparison of cities: Paris [12]; Maputo [7], Dhaka [8], Santiago [13], Boston and Singapore [14], London, Singapore and Beijing [2]. Research with a focus on a single city, or a set of single cities, bears the advantage that it can easily tap into local knowledge when questioning the quantitative results obtained.…”
Section: The Single-city Focus Of Urban Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the urban sensing literature, mobile phone data play a prominent role as they form a source of passively collected information (users do not need to make an explicit action to share their locations as would be the case in, for example, location-based services or social networks), for large shares of populations (a large proportion of the world population now owns a mobile device of any sort), captured at a rather high spatial resolution (in general, the density of cell towers is high in urban areas). Mobile phone data research in an urban context has been applied to a diversity of individual cities, or to international comparison of cities: Paris [12]; Maputo [7], Dhaka [8], Santiago [13], Boston and Singapore [14], London, Singapore and Beijing [2]. Research with a focus on a single city, or a set of single cities, bears the advantage that it can easily tap into local knowledge when questioning the quantitative results obtained.…”
Section: The Single-city Focus Of Urban Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need for segregation studies to expand from placebased measures to people-based measures, and to put more efforts to advancing temporally integrated analysis [16,18]. To fill these gaps, scholars started to incorporate travel behaviour and activities of individuals into their analytical frameworks through the usage of travel surveys and spatial trajectories [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Leveraging the notion and measurements of human activity space, these studies substantially improved the understanding of segregation beyond residential spaces, and also enabling individual-oriented and time-space views of social segregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lorenz curves in Figure 2 represent 130 the different degrees of agglomeration driven by housing (G origins = 0.32) and daily 131 activities (G destinations = 0.56). As is true for large cities [16,17], inferred trips were 132 largely directed towards a few, hyper-affluent areas. In our model, these areas receive 133 25% of all daily trips but occupy less than 5% of the metropolis; meanwhile, housing 134 places 25% of the population throughout 13.5% of the city's most densely populated 135 regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…between the residents of distant neighborhoods [16,17]. In what follows, we quantify the 23 agglomeration of urban mobility using two Gini coefficients 24 (0 ≤ G origins , G destinations ≤ 1) that use neighborhood-level census data to measure 25 spatial inequalities in the area-density of housing and activities throughout a city.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%