Why is the problem of beginning -much discussed in literary scholarship -not dealt with in similar depth by historians? This article attempts an answer to this question, and does so in three ways. First, it examines literary scholarship on textual openings, showing the various ways in which the beginning is given significance. Then, it examines and challenges the common presentation of historical discourse as distinct from fiction. Finally, it examines two sets of data: the openings of 100 historical monographs are analysed for their 'fictionality', and the openings of 200 research articles are analysed for their rhetorical structures.